Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

SSJVegeta

(1,544 posts)

7. Agreed. And that nuance would likely be revealed in the information that can be released

Reply to IbogaProject (Reply #6)

Fri Sep 5, 2025, 01:35 PM

Sep 5

Schmoozing with epstein for donations is obviously quite different from being his client for purposes of child rape. These women are telling us who raped them. So far Bill Clinton is not actually accused of raping anybody.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

IbogaProject

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Epstein discharge petition is headed for success -- with a nudge from Dems [View all] Dulcinea Sep 5 OP

No redactions! quaint Sep 5 #1

Rumor has it they'll be redacting all the repubs and leave the rest Iwasthere Sep 5 #2

The people on that client list are evil. Every single one of them. I dont care that a Dem gets outed anymore than if SSJVegeta Sep 5 #4

Actually Epstein did do some philantrophic schmoozing IbogaProject Sep 5 #6

Agreed. And that nuance would likely be revealed in the information that can be released SSJVegeta Sep 5 #7

It must be that national security will be compromised if Repuglycans are revealed. quaint Sep 5 #5

Don't tell us, Russ. Tell Laura Loomer. She's the one with the power to abolish it. Midnight Writer Sep 5 #3

Dems must hire good forensic sleuths pfitz59 Sep 5 #8

Absolutely! WinstonSmith4740 Sep 5 #9