Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

(8,780 posts)
58. Reuters, old and established as it is, hasn't been the most reliable source on developments in Ukraine in recent times
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 08:34 PM
Wednesday

Last edited Wed Nov 19, 2025, 09:36 PM - Edit history (2)

Its coverage is only as good as its stringers, and the fact this latest bid of blatant kite-flying is filtered via Axios is not encouraging. Let's just say Axios has form, and not good form, when it comes to anonymous sourcing and Ukraine-US relations.

This was in early 2022:

White House ‘appalled’ at Axios over Ukraine article
...
The White House spent much of Friday frustrated by an Axios report that it believes was based on a fabricated letter purportedly written by Ukraine’s top national security official.

The Axios story, written by reporter Zachary Basu, said that Oleksiy Danilov had asked the US earlier this month “to go beyond traditional military aid and provide the country with the funding, training and weaponry to support a long-term resistance movement.” But Ukrainian Ambassador Oksana Markarova later told Axios that she believed the letter was “falsified.” And officials at the National Security Council also told Axios they have no record of receiving such a letter from Danilov.
...
“We were appalled that Axios apparently did not have time to verify with Ukrainian officials whether or not this letter was a fake, but made sure to reach out to a former Trump official with no knowledge of the situation for a ‘gotcha’ quote,” the senior admin official told me. “And then we were even more appalled it stayed up all day despite our repeated asks to take the story down when became obvious the letter was a fake — which Axios should have dug up before publishing in the first place.”
...
Shortly after I contacted Axios for comment Friday evening, the outlet updated its story. Axios changed the headline — which initially read “Scoop: Ukraine sought long-term resistance funding” — to “Ukraine’s ambassador disputes letter asking U.S. for resistance support.” The new story, which included Markarova saying the document appeared “falsified,” cited a “former senior Ukrainian official close to Danilov” who told Axios “that they had received the letter from Danilov’s office, and that it was also distributed to Ukrainian American groups and think tank experts in Washington.” But crucially, the source also told Axios that he or she could not confirm the letter was officially transmitted to the US government — essentially the crux of the initial story.

Notably, at that point, the article didn’t include a correction or retraction, despite it seemingly having no real legs to stand on. Later in the evening, a proper correction was ultimately appended to the top of the story. It read, in part, “This corrects an original version of this story that stated the Ukrainian government ‘asked’ for additional assistance from the U.S. government, when Axios was unable to confirm the letter was actually sent.” Still, given that Axios is now conceding it was “unable to confirm” the main point of its initial story, it is surprising that a more forceful correction or full retraction wasn’t issued.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/18/media/axios-ukraine-article


Apart from the nebulous references to "security guarantees", what's supposedly proposed now is little different to the "deal" the Ukrainians rejected out of hand during the Alaska summit debacle and its backwash. The fact that the discussions have reportedly included Witkoff on the US side gives even less cause for confidence given his obsession with landholding, as befits a property developer, his ignorance of the basics of Ukrainian geography, the clear evidence of his being a poodle in past dealings with Putin, and his inability to even convey accurately to NATO allies the results of his meetings with Putin and what scant concessions Russia has indicated it might be prepared to make.

Vault over the paywall at the Axios article, and way below its snazzy headline, you'll come across a few snags (my bold):

Behind the scenes: One source with direct knowledge said Umerov was empowered by Zelensky to negotiate with Witkoff, and many of his comments were incorporated into the text of the 28-point plan.

* The source claimed many understandings were reached in the talks with Umerov.

* A Ukrainian official confirmed Zelensky sent Umerov to be briefed about the U.S. plan. but said it was an oral briefing and Umerov didn't receive a written proposal from Witkoff.

* The Ukrainian official denied that Zelensky's adviser accepted the terms of the plan during the meeting and claimed Ukraine objects to many of the points.

* Prior to meeting Umerov, Witkoff held extensive discussions on the plan with Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev.

https://www.axios.com/2025/11/19/trump-ukraine-peace-plan-russia-donbas


Witkoff was supposed to meet Zelensky yesterday during Zelensky's visit to Turkey for talks with Erdogan, but that was called off. Apart from those discussions, Zelensky has a few pressing domestic problems on his plate at the moment, and any hints at capitulation seem unlikely to be considered wise while the aftermath of the recent corruption problems plays out. In terms of Ukraine's non-US allies, such a scheme to placate Russia looks like a non-starter since Poland is incensed by what is believed to have been a Russian attack on some of it rail lines and other countries are being subjected to mounting military and non-military attacks. Some of the territory Ukraine is supposedly being expected to concede includes essential defensive lines Ukraine has spent a lot of time and resources installing because those areas are strategically vital for any further Russian incursions.

In some of the Ukrainian media, the focus seems to be more on, yet again, negotiations about Ukraine being held without due consideration of Ukraine's views, needs and interests, seemingly seen as inconvenient afterthoughts. Here's The Moscow Times (more reliable than its name might suggest):

U.S. Peace Proposal Requires Ukraine to Cede Land, Cut Army Size – Reports

Ukraine has received a new peace proposal from the United States that requires Kyiv to cede land controlled by Russia and more than halve its army's size, a senior official briefed on the proposal told AFP on Wednesday.

The plan appears to repeat Russia's maximalist terms — demands consistently rejected by Ukraine as tantamount to capitulation.

The draft provides for "recognition of Crimea and other regions that the Russians have taken" and "reduction of the army to 400,000 personnel," the source, who did not wish to be identified, told AFP. The plan would also see Ukraine giving up all long-range weapons.

"An important nuance is that we don't understand whether this is really Trump's story" or "his entourage's," the official added.

It was "unclear" what Russia was supposed to do in return, the source said.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/11/19/us-peace-proposal-requires-ukraine-to-cede-land-cut-army-size-reports-a91168


And here's the The Kyiv Independent:

US holding secret peace talks with Moscow to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Axios reports

The White House and Moscow have been secretly working on a proposal to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Axios reported on Nov. 18, citing U.S. and Russian officials.

U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian Envoy Kirill Dmitriev have extensively discussed the 28-point peace plan, an unnamed U.S. official said.

Dmitriev described the secretive peace deal optimistically, saying that, unlike in the past, "we feel the Russian position is really being heard."

Russia has repeatedly issued maximalist demands to Kyiv in previous direct peace talks, including that Ukraine give up its NATO aspirations, demilitarize, and cede territory that Kyiv controls.

https://kyivindependent.com/us-holding-secret-talks-with-moscow-to-end-russias-war-against-ukraine-axios-reports/

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No shit! Ray Bruns Wednesday #1
Why do I believe the unnamed sources have the initials DJT? Ray Bruns Wednesday #2
Yup. sheshe2 Wednesday #32
Putin must have some real nasty shit on Trump RazorbackExpat Yesterday #86
Diddling Donny can't stay out of Putin's pants. Safe as Milk Wednesday #3
What if Putin's Bubba? BadgerMom Thursday #73
Ukraine doesn't have to anything the US says. It is a sovereign nation. NotHardly Wednesday #4
Ukraine wants a security guarantee from the US. maxsolomon Wednesday #15
Russia had an agreement with Ukraine and had agreed republianmushroom Wednesday #21
Like many big powers they renege on their agreements...nt mitch96 Wednesday #24
I think Ukraine is disinclined to accept security agreements, as the... LudwigPastorius Wednesday #22
Quite true. However, NATO membership may be unobtainable. maxsolomon Wednesday #23
Russia opposed Ukraine joining NATO because it would have blocked them from taking the land for the future pipelines. cstanleytech Wednesday #33
Most of the NATO nations couldn't give a stuff what Russia wants. n/t Emrys Wednesday #48
Russia invaded Donetsk precisely to stop NATO extending membership to Ukraine. maxsolomon Wednesday #53
Russia's rationales for its invasion vary almost as windingly as a Trump diatribe. Emrys Wednesday #61
Helpful post, maxsolomon Thursday #83
I can't immediately find a map of the situation in 2023, but if it helps, Emrys Thursday #84
Well, I hope your optimism is correct. maxsolomon Yesterday #85
Their last security guarantee when giving up nukes didn't hold up so well SamuelTheThird Wednesday #26
Yes, I am aware. maxsolomon Wednesday #28
Please research blue-wave Wednesday #35
I don't need to research as I already knew about it. maxsolomon Wednesday #37
I'm saying blue-wave Wednesday #38
US security assurances are only as good as the word of the President karynnj Wednesday #40
What would Russia get in the deal then? Polybius Wednesday #59
What will Russia get? blue-wave Thursday #70
Ok, so the war doesn't end then n/t Polybius Thursday #75
it ends the way the Russia war in Afghanistan ended lapfog_1 Thursday #76
That could take years Polybius Thursday #77
then it will take years... lapfog_1 Thursday #78
This is misunderstood. Ukraine DID NOT receive Security Guarantees WarGamer Wednesday #46
Correct. Emrys Wednesday #49
Ukraine needs to be in NATO or have signed legal defense GUARANTEES from US, UK, Germany, Poland and France. WarGamer Wednesday #50
Over the past few years, Ukraine has signed bilateral security agreements with a number of countries Emrys Wednesday #62
The only agreement that would blue-wave Thursday #69
If you want to split hairs over the blue-wave Thursday #72
All I have to say is, I get spanked for asking a question but, gab13by13 Wednesday #5
"linking this right wing talking point" - this is news, FFS muriel_volestrangler Wednesday #6
Posting 2 unnamed sources for the article because of the sensitivity, gab13by13 Wednesday #10
I don't think you understand what news is. muriel_volestrangler Wednesday #14
Hopefully, Ukraine will say "fuck that shit" Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #7
"give up land, some arms under US peace plan...... yea that ain't gonna happen.. nt mitch96 Wednesday #25
FU, Putin and drumphf! Slava Ukraini! electric_blue68 Wednesday #8
Again, like before, I say BULLSHIT!! bluestarone Wednesday #9
Handing Putin victory from the abyss of defeat CanonRay Wednesday #11
After all this, now Putin is allowed to take land from Ukraine just to go away and leave them alone FakeNoose Wednesday #12
Wasn't this same plan rejected a few months ago? (nt) William Seger Wednesday #13
The US should butt out and F*ck off. sinkingfeeling Wednesday #16
There's absolutely no way. LudwigPastorius Wednesday #17
trump kissing Putin ass. republianmushroom Wednesday #18
Why should they give anything up? They didn't start the war. Putin should have to pay them to rebuild the country. Vinca Wednesday #19
Rewarding Russia for its invasion? What a plan. Dave Bowman Wednesday #20
Trump cannot stop blowing Pootie Skittles Wednesday #27
Trust the Russians and any agreement they sign. republianmushroom Wednesday #29
3 Words: Fuck That Shit! Nictuku Wednesday #30
When will the world ever learn? blue-wave Wednesday #31
I approve this plan......if it includes arrests and war crime trials for a number of Russians. cstanleytech Wednesday #34
LOL, why wasn't such a deal worked out with Iraq and Kuwait? RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Wednesday #36
US Security Guarantee Nasruddin Wednesday #39
Nope. Not the right move. Russia go home and expletive you and your horse. twodogsbarking Wednesday #41
And what weapons and territory will Russia give up in exchange? WestMichRad Wednesday #42
Just say NO Bayard Wednesday #43
Now the population of Crimea is mostly all Russian womanofthehills Yesterday #87
I'm betting if Crimea was returned to its rightful owner, Bayard Yesterday #88
Am I wrong in thinking this sounds more like a demand that Ukraine surrender to Russia? slightlv Wednesday #44
Budapest Memorandum 2 paulrevere2018 Wednesday #45
F this "peace agreement." One sided BS. Drumpf has been in bed with Vlad for at least 9 years. Evolve Dammit Wednesday #47
This pisses me off. AllyCat Wednesday #51
As usual, Dump bends over for Putin mdbl Wednesday #52
Russian attitude..what's mine is mine .what's yours is negotiable! Playingmantis Wednesday #54
this is bullshit. ananda Wednesday #55
Be quiet piggy! bronxiteforever Wednesday #56
This all from Putin using his power over tramp 3825-87867 Wednesday #57
Reuters, old and established as it is, hasn't been the most reliable source on developments in Ukraine in recent times Emrys Wednesday #58
Be quiet piggy Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Wednesday #60
Trump and Putin JPK Wednesday #63
I hope Zelenskyy tells them to fuck off and Europe backs him ChicagoTeamster Wednesday #64
x2 Sam I Yam Thursday #71
screw that SaydiTom Wednesday #65
Bullshit plan designed to appease Putin. He'll take the win and keep going. Martin68 Wednesday #66
What about that rare earth minerals deal trump wanted from Ukraine?? IcyPeas Wednesday #67
Stick it up your asses, Trump and Putin. Efilroft Sul Wednesday #68
Ukraine, Don't Do It! Can't trust US anymore Bread and Circuses Thursday #74
Give'm an inch and they'll take a mile. no_hypocrisy Thursday #79
I'd say Krasnov's status a a Russian asset "bothers" America as much as his being an "alleged pedophile." Miles Archer Thursday #80
One word answer Botany Thursday #81
"would be" expected nuxvomica Thursday #82
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: Ukraine expect...»Reply #58