Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(157,142 posts)
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 03:53 PM Monday

Tesla autopilot on trial: DMV seeks to suspend the company from doing business in California [View all]

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

July 21, 2025


The fate of Tesla’s business in California, at least for the next 30 days, could be decided in a stuffy second-floor hearing room in Oakland. There, attorneys for the electric car company and the Department of Motor Vehicles are facing off this week before an administrative judge, over claims that Tesla deceived consumers with its autopilot and self-driving features.

Officials at the DMV filed those allegations in July 2022 and amended them in November 2023, seeking to suspend Tesla’s licenses to manufacture and sell vehicles in California for at least 30 days. Additionally, the department is pursuing a court order for the electric vehicle to pay an undetermined sum in restitution. In court filings, attorneys for the state Department of Justice have cited four phrases or product descriptions from Tesla’s website that state officials describe as misleading or that amount to false advertising.

These include: “autopilot”; “full self-driving capability”; a promise that the system “is designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver’s seat”; and claims that cars can effectively drive people to their destinations, with the vehicle navigating streets, freeways and intersections and then automatically parking itself. “These labels and descriptions represent specifically that respondent (Tesla)’s vehicles will operate as autonomous vehicles, which they could not and cannot do,” Attorney General Rob Bonta wrote in a July 17 brief.

Attorneys for Tesla argue, to the contrary, that while the company’s driver assistance technology qualifies as “state of the art,” the company “has always made clear” that its vehicles are not fully autonomous, and that they require “active driver supervision” from a human. On Monday, each side presented opening statements before Administrative Judge Juliet Cox, and laid out how the case could shape how self-driving car features are marketed in the future.

Read more: https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/tesla-self-driving-dmv-20778527.php



I just heard this story on my local CBS radio affiliate about a half hour ago!
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tesla autopilot on trial:...