Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

cachukis

(3,250 posts)

33. Rich.

Reply to lonely bird (Reply #21)

Thu Apr 10, 2025, 06:48 PM

Apr 10

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pressed for evidence against Mahmoud Khalil, government cites its power to deport people for beliefs [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Apr 10 OP

Seriously? cachukis Apr 10 #1

Read 'em and weep. mahatmakanejeeves Apr 10 #2

Translation: "Due process? We don't need no stinkin' due process!" ShazzieB Apr 10 #6

"...basis for this determination is the alien's past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations..." erronis Apr 10 #9

Yep, that leapt out to me as well. progressoid Apr 10 #10

sane here gopiscrap Apr 10 #41

Obviously, if "beliefs" (including "expected" ones)... regnaD kciN Apr 10 #29

Did not know. Thanks. cachukis Apr 10 #15

Expected beliefs that compromise US Foreign Policy? Thunderbeast Apr 10 #28

Yeah but how does 1 student protesting compromise US foreign policy? Do the nazis marching around yelling Jews will tulipsandroses Apr 10 #31

Guess I have to read that section. cachukis Apr 10 #34

In that case, maybe the court should subpoena LilMarco to testify, Volaris Apr 11 #47

I'm with you. Seriously! Why do I think the judge is going to call bull shit on Rubio's pernouncement? flashman13 Apr 10 #27

All persons have rights under the First Amendment LetMyPeopleVote Apr 10 #3

1st Amendment rights are a gray area... Shipwack Apr 10 #5

That's fucking asinine Orrex Apr 10 #24

Oh lonely bird Apr 10 #21

Rich. cachukis Apr 10 #33

Anyone espousing that belief belongs in lockup. dchill Apr 10 #4

Tyranny Iamscrewed Apr 10 #8

Please clarify iemanja Apr 10 #23

"...government cites its power to deport people for beliefs..." dchill Apr 10 #36

Dupe. dchill Apr 10 #37

These guys are beginning to sound more and more like Figarosmom Apr 10 #7

They care about anti-semitism like they care about Pinback Apr 10 #32

Its an excuse to curtail Figarosmom Apr 10 #35

This, from an administration full of Jew hating white nationalists & a president who dines with neo-Nazis! tableturner Apr 10 #11

It's all a head fake. erronis Apr 10 #14

Yep. It's like the fox guarding the hen house. GreenWave Apr 10 #26

This is what I've asking about. It appears that you can be expelled maxsolomon Apr 10 #12

Thoughtcrime? Doubleplusungood. nt Buns_of_Fire Apr 10 #13

Thought crime like in believing in Democracy? LiberalArkie Apr 10 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author Daleuhlmann Apr 10 #16

The President seems to have judicial immunity... SomewhereInTheMiddle Apr 11 #46

Protesting Human Rights abuses is not antisemitic neohippie Apr 10 #17

we're circling the drain. barbtries Apr 10 #18

Indefinite detention is NOT deportation/ expulsion!! SSJVegeta Apr 10 #19

What to you think they are trying to do? iemanja Apr 10 #25

I think the admin is trying to hold him indefinitely SSJVegeta Apr 10 #39

Think what you like iemanja Apr 10 #40

They called the kidnappings to el salvador "deportations" too SSJVegeta Apr 10 #43

Protecting Jewish students... from harassment and violence in the United States... BurnDoubt Apr 10 #20

Just when you think... GiqueCee Apr 10 #30

I guess this means Trump will be deporting those who chanted "Jews will not replace us" in Charlottesville, yes? Solly Mack Apr 10 #38

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights applies to "the people", not to "citizens". LudwigPastorius Apr 10 #42

They just make this shit up, BidenRocks Apr 10 #44

That is a very weak argument, based on what foreign policy? tornado34jh Apr 10 #45