This particular phrase "expected beliefs" leaps out.

Expect by whom? Is this the prosecution's right to determine how somebody might prospectively believe?

Can we charge babes in swaddling to be extradited because then might someday think that all genders should have equal rights? (As one example.)

…are grounds for deporting a green-card holder, they’re also grounds for renditioning citizens.

Participation in this forum, or even this thread, would be sufficient to land each and every one of us in CECOT.

George Orwell couldn't make this shit up!

not replace us compromise US foreign policy?
How does Rubio make this argument that a lone student compromises US foreign policy? How So? Especially when there is no crackdown on Nazis. I know they are hypocritical so I don't expect a coherent argument about why there is no crackdown for Nazis. But I am interested in the legal argument that a lone student somehow compromises US foreign policy interests.

in open court and under cross. Yaknow, so he can tell us personally, in his own words, what 'compelling foreign policy interest' is involved here.

You cannot deport someone for exercising their First Amendment rights

when it involves Israel.

There are some state laws that prohibit you from even asking if a product is made in Israel.

I believe you, but it’s fucking asinine

You sweet, Summer child.

Yes, you can…now.

Enough people voting wanted a return to White man rule that they accepted a convicted felon who lies as he breathes. A man who only cares about himself.

In El Salvador.

Who's next because of their intent to adulterate the constitution to suit their wants?

Are you talking about Khalil?

Clear?

Putin and his fake " fight" against anti-Semitism.

girls’ sports and the vanishingly small number of trans female athletes. It’s nothing but a cudgel for most of them.

Free speech and perpetrate violence.

simply on the the SoS' subjective opinion of your "beliefs".

Khalil is gone.

the rest of the executive branch does not. Find the lawyer who did not deliver the judges demand in contempt. If necessary, take it all the way to the Cabinet level. Just leave the Old Man out of it.

Jail all the executive branch except the top and see where it goes.

I have a dream ...

Speaking out against policies and actions carried out by a government is not antisemitic

i'm horrified over and over and over at what is going on.

The government would have to actually expel them if it thinks it has a right to do so (a doubtful pretense), and they aren't even doing that. In the meantime billions in taxpayer money is being used to house people that the government supposedly thinks shouldn't be in the country.

Deportation is the purpose of the hearing.

Under the most inhumane conditions it can get away with as a statement to anybody else who wants to defy them. We will see more of it in the near future. I wouldnt be surprised if the admin is likely trying to send him to the El Salvador prison. I dalso don't think the hearing will make a lick of difference in what the administration decides, either. So far they seem to have been getting away with blatantly defying judges orders.

But this was a deportation hearing.

Last edited Fri Apr 11, 2025, 02:08 AM - Edit history (1)

I just hope he is either actually deported or released consistent with his constitutional right to a speedy trial only after his right to free speech and due process was completely violated.

As illustrated by all the right-wing militias being targeted and prosecuted for their hate-speech, intimidation and violence. What percentage do you suppose among the "patriots" assailing Congress on J6 were there protesting Anti-Semitism? Rubio's just another Shit-Stick... stirring, stirring until the stink is unbearable. Little MarKKKo, how did you get to be such a BIG ASSHOLE?????

... these vile, sub-human Republican bags of manure couldn't sink any lower.

Yeah, didn't think so.

White supremacists are safe with Trump.

as they go along.
No basis in anything besides bullshit.

So does that mean that if this government supports Russia and people protest this that they will somehow be "damaging to US foreign policy?" That is the excuse? I mean, are they basically saying that anybody who criticizes their foreign policy could be considered a danger? I hardly think that Mahmoud Khalil would be considered a dangerous person compared to other people here in the US. Honestly, I am more worried about right-wing violence if anything.