Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,255 posts)
25. Ridiculous. "scrubbing" the files will only make things worse for Trump.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 11:05 PM
Tuesday

There are plenty of people who have seen the files. Who knows how many people were working on the investigation under the Biden DOJ which Trump/Bondi stopped immediately upon taking office but I'm sure there were a lot of people working on it. The Biden DOJ was deciding who to charge and with what crimes. I'm sure there will be whistleblowers revealing the truth if necessary. Oh, and the bill itself details the only information that can be legitimately withheld or redacted. The only info that can be legally redacted is names and personal info of the victims. The names of any persons who had contact with Epstein that are mentioned in the files should be released. Embarrassment is not a valid reason for redaction.

(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that—

(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;


(C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary;

(D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person; or

(E) contain information specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.

(2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress.

(3) To the extent that any covered information would otherwise be redacted or withheld as classified information under this section, the Attorney General shall declassify that classified information to the maximum extent possible.

(A) If the Attorney General makes a determination that covered information may not be declassified and made available in a manner that protects the national security of the United States, including methods or sources related to national security, the Attorney General shall release an unclassified summary for each of the redacted or withheld classified information.


Oh and Epstein victims have indicated they are ready to name names.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You're right; they aren't that clever- biophile Tuesday #1
Are you sure? The bill passed with a veto proof majority Raven123 Tuesday #2
doesn't matter. Wiz Imp Tuesday #5
Nothing would stop the same bill being forced back in December EdmondDantes_ Tuesday #10
I agree with that, but you still have to factor in that Wiz Imp Tuesday #12
Seems rather conspiratorial given it was 527-1 EdmondDantes_ Tuesday #15
Not remotely conspiratorial Wiz Imp Tuesday #17
Illogical, but I learned something Raven123 Tuesday #11
He doesn't think twice. Iggo Tuesday #18
Twice is two times more than he thinks dpibel Tuesday #19
You sure? I think 2 is five time more than he thinks Jerry2144 Tuesday #22
500 percent, 600 percent, 1400 percent! dpibel Tuesday #28
But pee wee german does. niyad Tuesday #21
Both houses have been using pro-forma sessions... appmanga Tuesday #32
Winning answer. bottomofthehill Tuesday #33
This is possinle, BUT i gotta say again, their plan is bluestarone Tuesday #3
Will be hard for them to justify enough to get around the text of the bill Wiz Imp Tuesday #6
I hear ya, but bluestarone Tuesday #7
Try not to post on any social media that the stooges read vapor2 Tuesday #4
This is victim Haley Robson from this morning Wiz Imp Tuesday #8
There will still be pro-forma sessions every few days, there hasn't been a real recess since like 2006. tritsofme Tuesday #9
That's why I said it was highly unlikely, but it was done very frequently in the past Wiz Imp Tuesday #14
The same process that has prevented recess appointments since 2007 would prevent this as well tritsofme Tuesday #16
You say they aren't that clever. Yet, could that be why karynnj Tuesday #13
They may not be that clever. .but pee wee german is. Which may explain niyad Tuesday #20
"It would not be a good look" is the understatement of the year Prairie Gates Tuesday #23
I doubt this maneuvering will be necessary. LudwigPastorius Tuesday #24
Ridiculous. "scrubbing" the files will only make things worse for Trump. Wiz Imp Tuesday #25
I think it is more ridiculous to assume that Trump is going to comply with this law. LudwigPastorius Tuesday #26
And you think that people will accept that the files have no mention of Trump? Wiz Imp Tuesday #29
Trump is approaching the point Turbineguy Tuesday #27
The stress of this may actually kill him Wiz Imp Tuesday #30
Both houses have been using pro-forma sessions to prevent any shenanigans... appmanga Tuesday #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A crazy theory on what Jo...»Reply #25