Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ilikepurple

(396 posts)

5. Only to those who would believe a Biden era leaker.

Reply to marble falls (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 18, 2025, 06:01 PM

Yesterday

It might be enough to put enough of his supporters over the edge, but I’m not so sure it would be taken as an admission of guilt as much as competing evidence.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

mucifer

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So now we get whatever Bondi decides we get. [View all] Miles Archer Yesterday OP

The story remains the cover-up. That much has not changed. RockRaven Yesterday #1

100% correct, I am fully with you on that, and... Miles Archer Yesterday #8

The Friday evening after Thanksgiving... COL Mustard Yesterday #23

Yep. It's not a subpoena the DOJ can withhold docs from release by misapplying a rule or guideline. It is a LAW. pat_k Yesterday #24

Miles. That information undidacted already exists. The Biden WH had it, for one. If it's been scrubbed it would be a ... marble falls Yesterday #2

Only to those who would believe a Biden era leaker. Ilikepurple Yesterday #5

Why the fuck didn't Biden release it? SamuelTheThird Yesterday #7

Because it was part of an active criminal investigation of TACO. Releasing information during an investigation ... marble falls Yesterday #13

That would certainly make sense SamuelTheThird Yesterday #15

Comey's daughter was leading the investigation in the SDNY. Justice matters. Yesterday #27

Thank you. Joinfortmill 10 hrs ago #32

I hear you. Miles Archer Yesterday #9

I wonder what will be the misdirection. COL Mustard Yesterday #29

Except for the 35 % brain dead MAGA, it simply will not be believable if they exonerate Trump. Chasstev365 Yesterday #3

I cannot for the life of me "do the math" on Trump and conclude that he didn't sample Epstein's "wares." Miles Archer Yesterday #11

IOMD Redux bucolic_frolic Yesterday #4

I think there is more than one copy out there .only one makes no sense for this issue. Deuxcents Yesterday #6

If other people have copies of the originals BlueKota Yesterday #12

That's what I'm thinking and that will make a cover up even more interesting Deuxcents Yesterday #14

So after she refuses to release them, bluestarone Yesterday #10

You can bet the corporate media will take whatever is released at face value. BannonsLiver Yesterday #16

Is there any chance they can subpoena FBI agents? viva la Yesterday #17

Agreed AverageOldGuy Yesterday #18

I'm still waiting for Fitzmas Cirsium Yesterday #19

I cited both of those, here, yesterday Miles Archer Yesterday #20

Worse Cirsium Yesterday #26

It was always going to be. Did the fact the republicans all so eagerly voted for this not give a clue? Bev54 Yesterday #21

That's why i thought Trump suddenly "changed his tune": because the files got scrubbed... Beartracks Yesterday #22

Bondi isn't gonna like it under that bus Raven123 Yesterday #25

The cover up is always worse evilhime Yesterday #28

Same! sagetea Yesterday #30

Just like Bill Barr with the Mueller Report. blm Yesterday #31