Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

In It to Win It

(12,040 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 04:25 PM Tuesday

Trump's Justice Department may have accidentally handed Democrats five House seats - Ian Millhiser @ Vox [View all]

Vox - Gift Link

In a decision that could potentially reshape the 2026 midterm elections and cement the Democratic Party’s future control of the US House, a federal court just struck down the gerrymandered Texas maps that President Donald Trump pressured that state to enact. If the decision holds, it could cost Republicans as many as five House seats.

And that’s not all. The most remarkable thing about the three-judge panel’s decision in League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Abbott is that it turns on an incompetent decision by Trump’s own administration.

As Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, explains in the court’s opinion, Texas lawmakers initially “didn’t have much appetite to redistrict on purely partisan grounds” — even as Trump urged them to do so. But Texas Republicans appear to have changed their mind after the Justice Department sent a letter last July to Texas’s top officials, which demanded that the state redraw several districts to change their racial makeup.

That letter, as I’ll explain in more detail below, misread a federal appeals court opinion to mean that the state was required to remake its maps. According to Judge Brown’s opinion, “it’s challenging to unpack the DOJ Letter because it contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors.” He added that “even attorneys employed by the Texas Attorney General — who professes to be a political ally of the Trump Administration — describe the DOJ Letter as ‘legally[] unsound,’ ‘baseless,’ ‘erroneous,’ ‘ham-fisted,’ and ‘a mess.’”

Oops! Trump’s Justice Department may have accidentally handed Democrats five House seats

www.vox.com/politics/469...

Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser.bsky.social) 2025-11-18T21:15:01.580Z
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's hope so Jbraybarten Tuesday #1
Trump will raise hell with 'Pam' to find a way to overturn CA redistricting on same arguement Attilatheblond Tuesday #2
Oh, I'm sure SCOTUS will find a way to overturn this decision... regnaD kciN Tuesday #4
Sadly, I fear that entirely possible Attilatheblond Tuesday #5
Hellooooooo Shadow Docket n/t BaronChocula Tuesday #22
By my thinking, they don't need to find a way. bluestarone Tuesday #13
100 percent. There's literally no such thing as settled law in our legal system. BannonsLiver Tuesday #24
It's my understanding that the CA redistricting is strictly conditioned on that of TX. John Farmer Tuesday #8
Nah, not now that the people of CA have spoken. They're going through with this. Thanks, Texas. ancianita Tuesday #11
That's not what I'm reading. stopdiggin Tuesday #14
The Texas ruling does not affect California Prop. 50 LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #19
What happens to California's Prop 50 maps if Texas redistricting efforts are blocked? LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #17
I guess Texas forgot... COL Mustard Tuesday #28
We live on hope. efhmc 14 hrs ago #34
Good malaise Tuesday #3
Marc Elias coming up after commercials on Nicole malaise Tuesday #6
Bless the Mark Elias Group! ancianita Tuesday #12
This ruling is going to affect a number of Texas races LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #7
This means Jasmine Crockett can keep her district. ananda Tuesday #9
Yep malaise Tuesday #10
Well, no one ever said Donnie's DoJ was terribly bright. paleotn Tuesday #15
It's really scary how many total dimwits can get law degrees. (or MBAs,, etc.) erronis Tuesday #18
Just remember.... COL Mustard Tuesday #31
But how many politicians graduate below the 50% line in any field. Then went into politics. erronis Tuesday #32
As the old saying goes.... COL Mustard Tuesday #33
The school kids must have called him "Brissy" when he was growing up. nt Exp Tuesday #16
I hope California doesn't back down and they go forward with what they're gonna do until after the midterms oldmanlynn Tuesday #20
That is what I was going to ask, will this mean California may back off? I think they should stay Bev54 Tuesday #27
Good, they got what they deserve for trying to rig things. ChicagoTeamster Tuesday #21
The repukes think they are all so clever Javaman Tuesday #23
The meritocracy of super geniuses has a truly spectacular track record IronLionZion Tuesday #25
SCOTUS to the rescue. RandySF Tuesday #26
Yeah, if there's one thing the SC 6 can be relied on for, it's bending rules for Trump muriel_volestrangler Tuesday #30
Oopsie. TomSlick Tuesday #29
There is a crazed dissent to this ruling that is really strange LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's Justice Departmen...