Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

karynnj

(60,690 posts)

9. That is not the worst they could do

Reply to CousinIT (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 17, 2025, 08:46 AM

Monday

That would still identify people with some real guilt. However, what if they add stuff (on Democrats) that was never there or substitute a Democratic name for Trump's in places where not having a name of a perpetrator would be suspicious.

This would create pain, but I would hope that others who worked with the documents in the past would speak out.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump now supports release of Epstein files, now that the FBI has had time to sanitize them for him [View all] Augiedog Monday OP

Man, we're all on the same page here! jaymac Monday #1

If he releases scrubbed docs, that will totally fail. Arazi Monday #2

That's what I've always maintained. NCDem47 Monday #3

I hope to hell you're correct. (nt) Paladin Monday #4

He, and the MAGA cult are stupid enough to believe that would work Jerry2144 Monday #8

I DO believe you are right Arazi.... democratsruletheday Monday #11

Worst case scenario (i.e., delayed gratification) no_hypocrisy Monday #5

If FBI Covers it up purr-rat beauty Monday #6

One operative said... CousinIT Monday #7

That is not the worst they could do karynnj Monday #9

That is not the reason. Bluetus Monday #10

Not even that... Happy Hoosier Monday #12

That's what I'm afraid of too. Baitball Blogger Monday #13