Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(172,826 posts)
33. MaddowBlog-Trump eyes federal Epstein investigation that targets his foes, but not himself
Sat Nov 15, 2025, 03:20 PM
Saturday

The president wants the public to see the Epstein scandal as a hoax — except the parts related to people he doesn’t like.

Trump expects the DOJ to launch investigations into figures mentioned in the Epstein materials — but not himself.

He also wants us to see the underlying scandal as a “hoax,” except the parts related to people he doesn’t like, indifferent to the obvious contraction. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-11-14T16:56:13.198Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-eyes-federal-epstein-investigation-targets-foes-not-rcna243939

The revelations dovetailed with Republicans on the same committee releasing a tranche of 20,000 documents it received from the Epstein estate in response to a congressional subpoena. An MSNBC report noted that some of the additional email correspondence between Epstein and his associates was “unflattering” to Trump. A related report in The New York Times summarized, in reference to the documents: “Mr. Epstein insulted Mr. Trump and hinted that he had damaging information on him.”

In the immediate aftermath of the reports, the usually talkative president had very little to say about the reporting (which includes allegations that have not been substantiated by MSNBC). The Republican published a handful of missives to his social media platform on the matter, but most focused on his appeals to GOP lawmakers to follow his lead on the scandal......

There’s no point in trying to summarize in a single blog post every error of fact and judgment in the president’s 116-word rant — the Russia scandal, for example, still isn’t a scam — but the bottom line comprises three key elements.

The first is that Trump wants federal law enforcement to initiate an investigation into a variety of prominent figures mentioned in the Epstein materials — but not himself. That’s a tough position to take seriously.

The second is that the president wants the public to see the underlying controversy as a hoax, except for the parts related to people he doesn’t like. How does Trump reconcile the obvious contraction?
By ignoring it.

Finally, it’s worth emphasizing that the president continues to act as if he has decision-making authority at the Justice Department and the FBI. There is no modern precedent for a White House publicly declaring which of the president’s political foes deserve to be targeted with federal investigations, but in 2025 it has become an alarmingly common occurrence.

In late September, Trump used his platform to direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to go after three of his perceived political enemies. In October, he did it again, adding additional names to his enemies list. On Friday morning, he barked related orders.

I cut trump's tweet/truth social post from this post. If you want to read trump's tweet/truth social post go to the article. I try not to repost trump's disgusting social media posts when I can.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Tsf and Blondi are not very smart. I agree it is a mistake. chicoescuela Saturday #1
He's only doing it for them to say "its an open investigation" so the files can't be released Chasstev365 Saturday #2
This is correct. johnnyfins Saturday #3
Andrew Weissmann said the same, yesterday. gab13by13 Saturday #4
Yep -- stalls the file release while also dragging Dems thru the mud. A two-fer. allegorical oracle Saturday #13
Oh, he thinks it'll drag Dems through the mud, MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #15
Please do not insult our porcine brethren and sistren by lumping them niyad Saturday #16
Sowwy. MarineCombatEngineer Saturday #17
Snort!!! niyad Saturday #18
Are there any statute of limitations on any possible charges for things that may want to charge?-n/t marked50 Saturday #5
Blaming others for things Trump is guilty of is one of his go-to moves. mackdaddy Saturday #6
It's his only move HarryM Saturday #9
He wears a fuckin' ball cap everywhere. The President. WTF. twodogsbarking Saturday #7
The common touch? hay rick Saturday #12
Bad hair day Alice Kramden Saturday #14
No indictments drmeow Saturday #8
Rantings of a crazy man who feels trapped... paleotn Saturday #10
They are ignoring there is a HUGE difference between the relationships karynnj Saturday #11
I think they should absolutely vet any large donations. Trueblue Texan Saturday #19
Hundreds of thousands, yes karynnj Saturday #20
There are 2 prominent Democrats who have been named by one or more of Epstein's victims Wiz Imp Saturday #22
Did you see this one? True Dough Saturday #28
Yikes! This should probably be the end of her career. Wiz Imp Saturday #30
The dalliance with the ReTHugs comes as news to me as well True Dough Saturday #32
I looked at a handful of the documents which mentioned Clinton Wiz Imp Saturday #23
This will kick the can down the road for 6 to 12 months Ponietz Saturday #21
For some strange reason, he thinks Democrats will back off if Democrats are involved. No! We won't! Vinca Saturday #24
But while it's being "investigated" the Epstein files will be frozen CanonRay Saturday #25
Hopefly leaks will continue and outrage that they haven't been released will grow RockCreek Saturday #27
Is this his version of "Aw, maw, everybody else gets to do it." excuse?. Ping Tung Saturday #26
When was Clinton going to jet down to the island Norbert Saturday #29
Just deflection. republianmushroom Saturday #31
MaddowBlog-Trump eyes federal Epstein investigation that targets his foes, but not himself LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Going after Democrats on ...»Reply #33