They would NEVER let it get to a discovery stage.

they only one that'll get dragged through the mud are Blondi and Been A Dick, well, that's not quite true, they already live in the mud like rePIGS.

in with the scum!

Pretty much always has been.

He felony convictions were for business fraud. His civil losses are for sexual assault and loan fraud.

Anyone checked any of Trump's mortgage documents?

How much 'tax advice' did Donnie get from ole' pal Jeffrey?

Every accusation is a confession

Every day

will actually further piss off the MAGAts screaming to release the files!

And he's wondering what's the next shoe that's going to fall in the Epstein / Trump saga. He's trying to reinflate an old pack of lies. Sorry, Donnie. Not happening.

of any Democrats and Trump with Epstein. Barring new information, the Democrats met with Epstein because he gave campaign contributions and also contributed to universities. This is campaign financing rearing its ugly head.


With Bill Clinton, we know Epstein let him use his jet for travel to Africa for his foundation's charitable work. That was a huge gift, but super wealthy people are the main funders of NGOs like the foundation. For the politicians, several donated his contributions after charges came out. The politician can not be expected to vet every campaign contribution.

With Trump, you have Epstein's BFF for 15 years and he is mentioned in over half the email threads provided by the Epstein estate. This is significantly more than Bill Clinton. I would bet the majority of Clinton mentions will end up being either name dropping or someone writing about legitimate things Clinton was doing.

True they can’t vet every $5 and $10 donation, but the ones in the hundreds of thousands they certainly better.

What about the maximum donation to a campaign? Not to mention, prior to, I think, 2008, would Epstein have looked suspicious?

In a NYT article explaining his links to Chase, they explained how his ability to network among powerful people made others trust him.

Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson and former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell. I'm not aware of a single person who has ever tried to deny or downplay those allegations. That's because when it comes to sex trafficking and money laundering, the crimes are so abhorrent that all Democrats aren't ever going to excuse it. Democrats have a moral compass that makes clear thing like sex trafficking are abhorrent and need to be prosecuted. The political party of the offender is irrelevant. They are despicable human beings.

Many/Most Republican politicians on the other hand ALWAYS put the Party above the country. There is no crime that a Republican won't excuse as long it was committed by another Republican. IOKIYAR has been sacred gospel to Republicans for decades.

Extremely troubling how much influence Epstein had. This can be verified by other credible sources. It's not just some tweeter making something up, unfortunately.

Link to tweet

I'll be curious as to what explanation she gives for this. The fact that she represents the Virgin Islands where Epstein's island was located is no coincidence. There could be an innocent explanation for it. But in the end, she clearly was taking direction from Epstein which should be disqualifying.

Plaskett has served as the non-voting delegate to Congress from the VI since 2015. As a non-voting delegate, she has no real power (she can't vote on any legislation) but she can serve on Committees and participate in hearings. As a non-voting member, she was unable to sign the discharge petition for the Epstein files so we have no idea if she would have signed it if given the chance. What we do know, however, is that EVERY SINGLE Democrat who is a voting member DID SIGN the petition. So that implies every current voting Democrat in the House places justice for the victims above any fear of potential embarrassment (or worse) of Democrats from info in the files.

I found this interesting - I was not aware of this before.

She has some explaining to do now.

Every single document I looked at was a court document which contained apparent testimony which completely exonerated Clinton of ever visiting Epstein's island or having any connection to Epstein's sex trafficking.

A pedo is a pedo is a pedo. What we will do is use the opportunity to expose people who are not Democrats.

so we will never see them.

Unlike IQ47, he was actually working his job in the 1990s.

The president wants the public to see the Epstein scandal as a hoax — except the parts related to people he doesn’t like.

Trump expects the DOJ to launch investigations into figures mentioned in the Epstein materials — but not himself.

He also wants us to see the underlying scandal as a “hoax,” except the parts related to people he doesn’t like, indifferent to the obvious contraction. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-11-14T16:56:13.198Z