General Discussion

pat_k

(12,485 posts)

23. Certainly not all, but a couple may in 10 to 40 years

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 08:25 PM

Friday

I can't find any numbers for short-term intense exposure -- just that it "increases risk," of asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma,
with some qualifying as "slight increase" depending on concentration in the air and size of the fibers.

It sounds like longer term exposure ranges from something like 1 in 100 to 1 in 1000.

Re: Fiber size is related to the type of disease you are at risk for. Came across this blurb somewhere:

Both smaller and larger asbestos fibers can pose a significant health risk, though the risk profile differs: larger, longer fibers are more strongly associated with certain diseases like lung cancer, while smaller, thinner fibers can also cause serious illnesses like mesothelioma because they can penetrate deeper into the lungs. No amount of asbestos is considered safe, and exposure to all types of fibers should be avoided.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seinan Sensei RockCreek

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So now we know Dementia T knows absolutely nothing about building anything in a city [View all] librechik Friday OP

Donald Trump has actually invented Dunning/Kruger Number 2. chouchou Friday #1

He knows. He shits on all and any laws. spanone Friday #2

And gets away with all of it Grim Chieftain Friday #7

This is a long term danger to people who live and work in DC pat_k Friday #11

What I'm afraid of Diraven Friday #14

Sounds like clean up is possible. pat_k Friday #16

So that cabal of jackals Seinan Sensei Friday #21

Certainly not all, but a couple may in 10 to 40 years pat_k Friday #23

So WH HVAC systems could be sucking in asbestos laden air. Dixiegrrrl Saturday #27

"disable HVAC systems to prevent fiber spread" pat_k Saturday #29

i read that he trucked the debris to a golf course to build new mounds. mopinko Friday #3

I can assure you that he also knows absolutely nothing about building anything, anywhere. All he does is destroying and Dave Bowman Friday #4

Where was it disposed of? EPA where are you. twodogsbarking Friday #5

Oh yeah. Trump's EPA will get right on it. Wednesdays Friday #8

Two weeks. twodogsbarking Friday #19

The East Potomac Golf Links Mosby Friday #22

Golf course, to make new mounds. Cheaper that moving dirt/rocks to courses Attilatheblond Saturday #31

Why do you think he demolished it so quickly? tinrobot Friday #6

A source link would be helpful LoveTheDU Friday #9

... progressoid Friday #20

Thank you! LoveTheDU Friday #24

This is clearly outside his wheelhouse... BurnDoubt Friday #10

No doubt that scab company he hired to do the demolition pwb Friday #12

I don't think they were "scabs". maxsolomon Friday #15

Since the second floor was added in 1942 Ruby the Liberal Saturday #25

You're correct that it's quite likely there was asbestos in one form or another. maxsolomon 23 hrs ago #36

Isn't the general contractor more responsible than Anal Fistula? 3Hotdogs Friday #13

You are ultimately liable Ruby the Liberal Saturday #26

Say what????? dickthegrouch Saturday #33

Brain fart Ruby the Liberal Sunday #34

The Federal Govt permits itself in DC. maxsolomon 23 hrs ago #37

Of course he knows canetoad Friday #17

Does this refer to something other than the speculation more than a week ago? Ms. Toad Friday #18

Places with or without PATRICK Saturday #28

Yeah, there's no doubt asbestos was all over that east wing. Farmer-Rick Saturday #30

Remember this is the guy that wanted MAGA - Make Asbestos Great Again. He thought it was a great building material Marie Marie Saturday #32

Right on brand Ruby the Liberal Sunday #35