Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(37,632 posts)
18. He actually does explain his concerns about methodology -
Mon Sep 1, 2025, 01:19 PM
Monday

They are the same kinds of things I would ask about: Exclusion of unvaccinated children from the study - if you are studying whether an ingredient in vaccines causes autism, why exclude what seems to be an obvious control group? Exclusion of children who died under age 2. Dismissal of a sub-group which appeared to show a dose-related increase of 67% in those born from 2007-2018.

These are valid questions - which a paper linked to above answers.

Being peer-reviewed does not mean perfect. And you don't have to have a competing study to question the methodology of another study.

Not that I want this particular piece of shit in control of the health of this country - but let's live in (and challenge) reality, not further clutter the world with alternate facts.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RFK, Jr., Demanded a Vacc...»Reply #18