Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(56,531 posts)
40. We'll see. It's still early. That article is just one man's opinion, but things are looking good for her.
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:47 AM
Aug 1

I think Katie Porter knows she flubbed her Senate campaign by attacking fellow Dems, and has changed her tone. This time she is reserving her criticisms for Trump, at least for now. She may not need to attack the other Dems running. A March poll that excluded Harris showed Porter with a 28-point lead, leading across audiences and party lines. The poll of Democrats and No Party Preference primary voters shows her winning a commanding 36 points, with all other announced or likely Democratic candidates polling in single digits. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:5b318f9d-9976-4f88-8c25-77b1e11141e2

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Harris needs to endorse her SSJVegeta Jul 30 #1
Yes. Pelosi's endorsement would help too. SunSeeker Jul 30 #4
Do you mean Adam Schiff? SSJVegeta Jul 30 #5
Yes, I misspoke! SunSeeker Jul 30 #7
Haha nope I understood! SSJVegeta Jul 31 #11
Yes. Meanwhile on the dark side, guess we won't have wife beater Steve Garvey to ridicule this time. brush Jul 31 #17
There is very little in this world that would make me happier, save an asteroid hitting Trump on the first tee. FadedMullet Jul 30 #2
Only thing that would make me happier would be ... cannabis_flower Jul 31 #22
You're right, if we are to dream, let's dream big. FadedMullet Jul 31 #35
Katie's a cinch two termer. oasis Jul 30 #3
It would be nice. California has never had a female governor. nt SunSeeker Jul 30 #6
She's a hard worker and wicked smart. oasis Jul 30 #10
Really? cannabis_flower Jul 31 #25
I don't happen to live in California, PoindexterOglethorpe Jul 30 #8
I have supported Porter from the start. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 30 #9
She has two big competitors Fiendish Thingy Jul 31 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Jul 31 #14
Maybe for cash from big corporate donors Fiendish Thingy Jul 31 #18
Porter may clinch the tech bros with her support of crypto. SunSeeker Jul 31 #21
There are a few other decent Dems running Retrograde Jul 31 #13
She really flamed out in the last statewide race against Schiff. Nixie Jul 31 #15
The Senate race was over when Pelosi endorsed Schiff. SunSeeker Jul 31 #20
Cali takes a lot of money OrangeJoe Jul 31 #27
Katie flubbed up a lot on her own. It was her choices in how she Nixie Jul 31 #33
Her going negative against Schiff turned off a lot of people JoseBalow Jul 31 #24
She was already losing. It was a desperate Hail Mary that didn't connect. nt SunSeeker Jul 31 #28
True, it was ugly and unnecessary JoseBalow Jul 31 #30
Exactly. It was her campaign attack choices that did not resonate. Nixie Jul 31 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Aug 1 #38
As good as she is, I haven't received my ballot yet. usonian Jul 31 #16
The primary isn't until next June Fiendish Thingy Jul 31 #19
I was just remarking on the early "call" of the results. usonian Jul 31 #23
It's just Jack Ohman's opinion. SunSeeker Jul 31 #29
I don't read the SF Chronicle. It's usually paywalled. usonian Jul 31 #31
It's not final yet and there are other great Democrats running JI7 Jul 31 #26
I want to see who else running Raine Jul 31 #32
she's got my vote. WarGamer Jul 31 #36
California voter here fujiyamasan Aug 1 #37
Still not convinced she'll win statewide. tinrobot Aug 1 #39
We'll see. It's still early. That article is just one man's opinion, but things are looking good for her. SunSeeker Aug 1 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Katie Porter is going to ...»Reply #40