Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(45,678 posts)
19. That is a distortion of what the Court is scheduled to do
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 11:54 AM
Jul 31

First, Maxwell has petitioned for certiorari -- she wants SCOTUS to review the appeals court decision that rejected her argument that the non-prosecution deal entered into by feds in Florida with Epstein should be interpreted as applying not only in Florida but also in other district courts, including the New York district court where she was tried and convicted. The issue of whether an agreement such as that one applies in all districts or only where it was entered into has divided the different courts of appeals -- and resolving a circuit split is often, but not always, the type of issue the SCOTUS often takes up.

Second, it has been scheduled for the Court to consider whether to grant or deny cert on September 29 because that is the first scheduling conference of the fall Supreme Court term. It will be one of hundreds and hundreds of petitions that will be considered at that time. The vast, vast majority will be denied and a relative handful will be granted. It takes the support of four of the nine justices for the petition to hear the case to be granted.

If Maxwell's petition is denied -- which is what the Trump DOJ has argued should happen -- Maxwell stays in jail. If the petition is granted -- because at least four justices think the case is "cert worthy", the court would then, typically, schedule briefing and oral arguments. Thereafter, sometime in late 2025 at the earliest and more likely sometime in 2026, the court would decide the case on the merits.Even if they grant cert it is not guaranteed that Maxwell willl win -- lower court decisions often are affirmed after the Court grants certiorari. If the decision on the merits is to affirm the lower court decision, Maxwell stays in jail. If the court resolves the circuit court split by siding with the courts that treat agreements such as the one at issue here as enforceable only in the district where entered, Maxwell's conviction would be overturned.

Sorry if the above rains on someone's parade.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Trumplandia is here. NoMoreRepugs Jul 30 #1
This could be the way they'd B.See Jul 30 #2
If they let her go Diraven Jul 30 #3
Small consolation it may be, but every one of the SOBs who work to free Maxwell become permanent blackmail targets 0rganism Jul 30 #4
We're never getting it back either, even if Trump and Vance and Johnson all have heart attacks tomorrow Eliot Rosewater Jul 30 #5
Call me Pollyanna Mossfern Jul 30 #6
No, It's NOT Over DET Jul 31 #10
I hear you, my comments are based in my anger Eliot Rosewater Jul 31 #15
Post removed Post removed Jul 31 #22
Pence? milestogo Jul 31 #25
Sorry about that, sometimes I get the two scumbags mixed up Eliot Rosewater Jul 31 #30
Better just give up on caring about anything now. mahina Jul 31 #33
The most perverse part about this round about way it's being done... Hugin Jul 30 #7
So why did the Trump administration oppose Maxwell's petition for certiorari? onenote Jul 31 #20
Because, that would include a review... Hugin Jul 31 #24
Nope. onenote Jul 31 #32
All of this made possible by the malignant tumor in DC known as the Heritage Foundation. Initech Jul 31 #8
Yes and they were sitting there licking their chops in 2016 Eliot Rosewater Jul 31 #16
And now look at the damage they're doing, turning the United States into a dictatorship. Initech Jul 31 #18
So the answer to erosion of democracy TheProle Jul 31 #29
What can we do then? Initech Jul 31 #36
Liberating Maxwell might be enough to Ilsa Jul 31 #9
Never, they're as loyal as they are stupid. dem4decades Jul 31 #26
I think this is just normal procedure. She appealed Melon Jul 31 #11
And from what I've be unable to easily avoid seeing ... Igel Jul 31 #13
How rude to interrupt the apocalyptic sky-is-falling fantasy with facts! tritsofme Jul 31 #17
+1 onenote Jul 31 #21
Criminal appeals to the Supreme Court are not "normal procedure" . . . markpkessinger Jul 31 #35
But normal in that it's within their rights to appeal. Melon Jul 31 #37
They won't help her. That would steal drumpf's leverage over her JoseBalow Jul 31 #12
The STOP reciting the Pledge of Allegiance if that happens. ProudMNDemocrat Jul 31 #14
That is a distortion of what the Court is scheduled to do onenote Jul 31 #19
It would be nice to offer your opinion, gab13by13 Jul 31 #28
My opinion, which isn't worth much since I'm not a member of the Supreme Court onenote Jul 31 #34
Sigh Eliot Rosewater Jul 31 #23
Yes, what she wants is the Court to find that she shouldn't have been prosecuted onenote Jul 31 #40
Likely a decision via Shadow Docket no_hypocrisy Jul 31 #27
I find it amazing at this late date so many haven't caught on that the Trumpists... Hugin Jul 31 #31
100 percent not a shadow docket case onenote Jul 31 #39
No. It ML's a routine petition for certiorari. Ms. Toad Jul 31 #41
She has filled a routine petition for certiorari bc, Ms. Toad Jul 31 #38
K&R UTUSN Jul 31 #42
And now this Eliot Rosewater Aug 1 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I just read the most corr...»Reply #19