Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Leaked letter is here "exactly as described...WSJ..." [View all]WhiskeyGrinder
(25,340 posts)1. Sure he did. Why on earth would the WSJ "leak" what it has instead of just sharing it itself? Come on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Sure he did. Why on earth would the WSJ "leak" what it has instead of just sharing it itself? Come on.
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#1
They did report on it. Three days ago. Here's link. Not a "LEAK". They did just report on it.
Bernardo de La Paz
Sunday
#4
Exactly. We are not sure because they complained about leaking a story, which did not occur. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Sunday
#6
Right, I'm talking about the image itself. Edited my other post for clarity.
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#8
I've seen this pic floated - but some are saying the source is questionable - this dude Dean Blundell - is more of a
tulipsandroses
Sunday
#7
weird letter that has a typed conversation? is this the font issue idea borrowed from Rove?
Shellback Squid
Sunday
#9
Look, we all know the letter exists. But sharing fake shit is a good way to degrade the entire information ecosystem --
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#17
If you run around telling people you tarred and feathered someone, and it's clear you haven't, people tend to stop
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#19
I saw this version on Facebook; it isn't the same. At least one, maybe both, must be fake.
Ocelot II
Sunday
#29