Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,199 posts)

13. The NATO deal is straightforward and immediately available. I have no idea if the sanctions will happen or when.

Reply to gab13by13 (Reply #9)

Sun Jul 20, 2025, 07:59 AM

Sunday

Nor can I find any info about this ban you heard about. You'll have to share a link with us because I can't find one and I haven't heard explicitly about such a specific ban.

The missiles thing is NATO, not EU.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Obvious: Murdoch has decided to take Krasnov down. [View all] speak easy Sunday OP

You would think by now they would both be dead. gordianot Sunday #1

Only the good die young Maeve Sunday #8

Nah, we're being played. Hugin Sunday #2

What was the secret Trump mentioned? mzmolly Sunday #19

Yeah, but BoRaGard Sunday #21

Yes, it will play a part in the dissolution of his cult. Hugin Sunday #24

Dont forget Elon Musk said it too. IcyPeas Sunday #3

See my post below yours, gab13by13 Sunday #5

He better pack a lunch. gab13by13 Sunday #4

"no missiles to Ukraine"? You haven't read about how it will be done. The 2028 law is not an issue. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #7

Most of my news comes from listening to people speak on freespeechtv.org gab13by13 Sunday #9

The NATO deal is straightforward and immediately available. I have no idea if the sanctions will happen or when. Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #13

You need to diversify and improve your news sources. Getting most of yours from one dubious source is not informed. Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #17

I'll believe if I see it. It is not obvious at all. A letter is not going to do it. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #6

Death by a thousand cuts, gab13by13 Sunday #10

It is an easy out to say Putin this, Putin that. No proof is offered. Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #15

He's probably starting to affect Murdoch's bottom line. GoCubsGo Sunday #11

Murdoch is just following orders gab13by13 Sunday #12

That's malarky. Prove it. Actors w same goals is not proof and you haven't proved Murdoch has such a big goal either.nt Bernardo de La Paz Sunday #18

Problem is the USA is being destroyed and even if people don't like vance much, it won't mucifer Sunday #14

He's meeting now with Vance in Montana. Weeks after Vance met with Musk and others in Montana. Scrivener7 Sunday #16

Vance visited Murdoch. viva la Sunday #20

Shady V WmChris Sunday #22

JD attempting to pre-empt a Court trial? ProudMNDemocrat Sunday #23

There is another obvious explanation- distraction from the GENIUS Act, Fiendish Thingy Sunday #25

Disagree. speak easy Sunday #26

Did you mean to post your reply twice? Fiendish Thingy Sunday #28

This message was self-deleted by its author speak easy Sunday #27