Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DNC gives David Hogg an ultimatum [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(162,888 posts)83. DNC Chair Ken Martin-Voters Should Pick their Candidates, Not Party Bosses
I have been active in state and county party politics for a long time. I have worked hard in the party and was elected as a Clinton Delegate to the 2016 National Convention. I agree with Ken Martin on his suggestions. Party leaders are supposed to be neutral and not take sides in primary contests. I am also in favor of changing the role of super delegates.
Again, the efforts of David Hogg to violate the role of the party are wrong.
https://bsky.app/profile/realtuckfrumper.bsky.social/post/3lnleihbvuu24
Link to tweet
https://time.com/7280045/voters-should-pick-their-candidates-not-party-bosses/
Theres been a lot of talk lately about the role of the Democratic Party, and what role the national party should play in picking our general election candidates. Recently, a DNC vice chair announced an initiative to put their thumb on the scale in democratic primaries. Let me explain why this is a mistake.
Truth be told, I'm a reformer, too. That's why I've spent the past decade making sure our party cannot ever again be perceived as having a thumb on the scale for one candidate. And also why, as DNC Chair, I am determined to make sure we dont repeat the same errors of the past.
Let me explain.
Eight years ago, the Democratic Party was at one of the lowest points in its history. Not only did we fail to stop Donald Trumps election, but we had lost the faith of Democratic voters. The DNC was besieged by accusations that it had favored one candidate over another during the presidential primary process. The controversy alienated even our partys most loyal supporters who felt that party bosses, not Democratic primary voters, were deciding which candidate would emerge in the general election as the Democratic nominee. They threatened to leave the party for good. .....
First, the 2016 primary had brought new attention to the role of superdelegates in our process. At a contested convention like the one in 2016, they could potentially cast the deciding votes in a close race. I put forward a solution that dramatically changed, and reduced, the role of superdelegates, ensuring that the will of the voters, and not party insiders, would prevail in choosing the partys nominee in the general election.
Second, along with my fellow Minnesotan, then-Rep. Keith Ellison, I advocated for a wide-reaching neutrality policy that would eliminate even the appearance of favoritism towards one candidate or another in the day-to-day work of the DNC. In my new position as Chair, I believe it is time this is cemented in our bylaws......
In the coming days, Ill introduce a new slate of structural reforms that codify these principles of neutrality and fairness into our official party rules, requiring all party officersmyself includedto remain neutral in all Democratic primaries. A clear neutrality policy protects against the misuse or abuse of power by those in official positions.
The Democratic Partys Charter puts it best: a party which asks for the people's trust must prove that it trusts the people.
Truth be told, I'm a reformer, too. That's why I've spent the past decade making sure our party cannot ever again be perceived as having a thumb on the scale for one candidate. And also why, as DNC Chair, I am determined to make sure we dont repeat the same errors of the past.
Let me explain.
Eight years ago, the Democratic Party was at one of the lowest points in its history. Not only did we fail to stop Donald Trumps election, but we had lost the faith of Democratic voters. The DNC was besieged by accusations that it had favored one candidate over another during the presidential primary process. The controversy alienated even our partys most loyal supporters who felt that party bosses, not Democratic primary voters, were deciding which candidate would emerge in the general election as the Democratic nominee. They threatened to leave the party for good. .....
First, the 2016 primary had brought new attention to the role of superdelegates in our process. At a contested convention like the one in 2016, they could potentially cast the deciding votes in a close race. I put forward a solution that dramatically changed, and reduced, the role of superdelegates, ensuring that the will of the voters, and not party insiders, would prevail in choosing the partys nominee in the general election.
Second, along with my fellow Minnesotan, then-Rep. Keith Ellison, I advocated for a wide-reaching neutrality policy that would eliminate even the appearance of favoritism towards one candidate or another in the day-to-day work of the DNC. In my new position as Chair, I believe it is time this is cemented in our bylaws......
In the coming days, Ill introduce a new slate of structural reforms that codify these principles of neutrality and fairness into our official party rules, requiring all party officersmyself includedto remain neutral in all Democratic primaries. A clear neutrality policy protects against the misuse or abuse of power by those in official positions.
The Democratic Partys Charter puts it best: a party which asks for the people's trust must prove that it trusts the people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
184 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Agree. I absolutely despise Democratic circular firing squads -- for once in our lives, let MAGAGOP do it.
Hekate
Apr 24
#120
The DNC must have poor judgment...Take Tulsi Gabbard as Vice Chair for example.
lostnfound
Apr 24
#27
We don't have to be listening to Schumer and Carvill to Disagree w Hogg on his strategy
electric_blue68
Apr 25
#125
Agreed. and isn't vice-chair Hogg collecting DNC pay on top of the 6-figure salary he gets from his PAC?
brush
Apr 28
#153
THIS !! People don't understand we're not liked cause we're offering what people want just the last sane choice
uponit7771
Apr 25
#135
It is not good enough for someone to say, "I'm a progressive! I give the purity tests around here because
betsuni
Apr 24
#105
Some here seem to think that effectiveness in Washington is measured in numbers of people attending a rally in Idaho
DFW
Apr 25
#148
And the motives of those who WOULD use a chainsaw are motives we have the right and duty to examine
DFW
Apr 25
#145
That's a good way of shooting ourselves in the foot. Challenging a good incumbent makes the R's work in the general
pnwmom
Apr 24
#10
Really? AOC challenged a (D) incumbent when she first ran and defeated him. Was that shooting our foot? ...
aggiesal
Apr 24
#73
We can thank Ted Kennedy's challenge of Jimmy Carter for Carter's loss to Ronald the actor Reagan.
pnwmom
Apr 24
#96
Wrong, Jimmy Carter did not lose because of Ted Kennedy's challenge, because Carter actually won in the Primary ...
aggiesal
Apr 24
#109
Of course Carter won the primary, that's why he could run against Reagan. But he'd spent the primary months having
pnwmom
Apr 24
#116
We'll never know. But we DO know that he fought Carter up to and including the convention,
pnwmom
Apr 24
#121
AOC's challenge didn't suck up Dem dollars that could have gone to defeat Republicans.
JustABozoOnThisBus
Apr 24
#107
Yup, let's settle for second best, to regain the house with JV team. Got it. n/t
aggiesal
Apr 25
#124
In a deep blue district. We should not force out incumbents who've proven they can beat...
brush
Apr 28
#158
If the incumbent is not the best choice, hell yes they should be challenged, safe seat or not. ...
aggiesal
Apr 28
#161
I'll agree that the incumbent proved he.could beat the (R) candidate during that election. ...
aggiesal
Apr 29
#167
I'm mentioning Hogg because he's vice-chair of the DNC which is supposed to remain neutral...
brush
Apr 29
#173
Beating a (R) doesn't mean they can beat every (R). Got that? We're never going to agree on this subject. ...
aggiesal
Apr 29
#176
If that's that kind of representation you want, someone that can just beat a (R), then have at it ...
aggiesal
Apr 29
#178
I find that interesting because when a representative doesn't vote the party line they get attacked here
MichMan
Apr 24
#78
The way I see it, I expect my Representative to initiate legislation to benefit their constituency ...
aggiesal
Apr 24
#112
I thought the rule change proposal came about because this is the first time a DNC official has stated that he intends
WDLAL
Apr 24
#37
I have never done phone banking for a primary, only for the general election, and I never had to say
JohnSJ
Apr 24
#19
Were you calling from a list of people who were registered as Democrats from the previous
JohnSJ
Apr 24
#21
That was a challenging task for you then. We also left voice mails. I think the biggest problem with
JohnSJ
Apr 24
#23
Good on you! And you don't have to have a s a d to be nervous calling....
electric_blue68
Apr 25
#130
Good. I remember when David Hogg pushing for gun legislation played the "both sides game", when
JohnSJ
Apr 24
#7
+1. Most people survived sudden traumatic events (e.g. shootings, accidents) because of sheer luck.
dalton99a
Apr 24
#38
I was thinking that. Certainly meaningful to those local and State constituents!
electric_blue68
Apr 25
#128
Only those who vote decide. AOC won her first primary with 5% of the district voting
DFW
Apr 25
#147
Those believing CTs about Status Quo Elite Establishment rigging primaries think Hogg is correct and
betsuni
Apr 24
#31
Here we go again. Learning nothing. Rewarding status quo and not vision or boldness.
Nanjeanne
Apr 24
#32
We could do more if we instead focused on getting a majority and gaining control, no?
Oopsie Daisy
Apr 24
#72
Democrats don't rig elections, are not corrupted by corporations, lobbyists, donors.
betsuni
Apr 24
#45
They Don't rig elections; that's absolutely true, but some may kowtow to corporations too much...
electric_blue68
Apr 25
#132
I'm all for primaries, and in fact they are an essential feature of our Democracy. But I'm not for Hogg
Scrivener7
Apr 24
#36
Yes. I want the DNC to find and field viable candidates in Republican-held districts.
IL Dem
Apr 24
#43
'David Hogg Has to Decide': Irate Democrats Want Hogg to End His Primary Gambit -- Or They Want Him Gone
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 24
#49
If they were so unbiased themselves, we would have been talking about Senator Jeff Jackson's re election campaign
ms liberty
Apr 24
#60
Actual change? How about the Existential Differences Right Now between Republicans, and Democrats.
electric_blue68
Apr 25
#138
DNC Chair Ken Martin-Voters Should Pick their Candidates, Not Party Bosses
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 24
#83
Here is more on money Hogg is being paid by his PAC and the fact that Hogg may be using DNC mailing lists
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 24
#95
Who needs David Hogg when we have the Justice Democrats primarying good Democrats?
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 28
#160
He's looking to springboard his carreer. This is not the time to be disruptive or in disarray.
marble falls
Apr 29
#179