Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Liberal YouTubers

Bluetus

(1,425 posts)

4. There is an old axiom among lawyers,

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Thu Aug 28, 2025, 11:44 PM

15 hrs ago

that any prosecutor with any functioning brain cells (not destroyed by decades of deep alcoholism in this case) can get an indictment against a ham sandwich because there is nobody in the GJ room to argue the side of the accused, and the standard for indictment is extremely low: probably cause, i.e only a whisker above a 50/50 call.

But this lifelong drunk literally couldn't get an indictment against a ham sandwich.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Grand Jury Sides With Sandwich Slinger, Humiliating Bondi, Pirro, + DOJ [View all] MagaSmash Yesterday OP

I can't get past looking at their mar a lago faces and how the Botox has destroyed their brain cells kimbutgar Yesterday #1

That's Presuming There Were Any to Begin With The Roux Comes First Yesterday #2

Ha ha so true! kimbutgar Yesterday #3

There is an old axiom among lawyers, Bluetus 15 hrs ago #4

Are they even capable of shame and humiliation? MagaSmash 4 hrs ago #5