Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redqueen

(115,185 posts)
3. I agree completely about Yang being 3-4 steps ahead.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:26 AM
Oct 2019

It's sad that it is so pleasantly surprising when Yang is asked substantive questions and allowed to speak about his vision for America, but many in the MSM do treat him as an unserious candidate.

Did you happen to catch his appearance on Maddow? So disappointing to see her treat her so very differently than she did Warren. I was also disappointed that she treated the issue of US election interference as something which had to be proven by him, when we all know that she knows this is a fact. Seemed a waste of time and a rather pathetic attempt at a 'gotcha' moment. I'm glad he didn't give her the sound bite she was so obviously digging for.

I just hope other people paying attention now are noticing the unfair treatment. It isn't right or fair. Sadly I have seen at least one person here who seemed to be happy that the debates limit certain candidates' speaking time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Yang 2020»So - has anyone talked ab...»Reply #3