Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Celerity

(50,912 posts)
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 08:08 PM Apr 2020

Wisconsin's Supreme Court rules along partisan lines to require the state to hold its election Tues. [View all]

Wisconsin’s plan to hold an election in the middle of a pandemic is back on.

https://www.vox.com/2020/4/6/21209670/wisconsin-governor-delays-election-tony-evers-republicans-state-supreme-court

On Monday, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers attempted to reschedule an election the state is planning to hold on Tuesday, handing down an order suspending in-person voting until June 9 “unless the Legislature passes and the Governor approves a different date for in-person voting.” On a party-line vote, however, the Republican-controlled state Supreme Court struck down Evers’s order, meaning that the state is now on track to hold its election as originally scheduled.

The vote was 4-2, with Justice Daniel Kelly, a staunch conservative, recused because he is a candidate in Tuesday’s election. Republicans have fought tooth and nail against nearly any effort to delay the election or to make it easier for voters to cast mail-in ballots, and the state Supreme Court is dominated by Republicans. Last week, Evers called the state legislature into session and asked it to delay the election. But the Republican-controlled legislature ended that session a few seconds after it was convened.

Republicans also rejected Evers’s proposal to automatically mail ballots to every voter in the state, and they’ve fought hard in federal court — including in the US Supreme Court — to prevent ballots from being counted after the original April 7 election date. On Monday evening, the US Supreme Court ruled against a lower court judge’s order extending the deadline for receiving mail-in votes. Nearly a dozen states have chosen to postpone presidential primary and local elections as most Americans remain at home to avoid spreading the coronavirus.

Wisconsin’s election is shaping up to be a trainwreck

With the coronavirus pandemic raging, most poll workers had refused to work Tuesday’s election, leading Evers to call up the National Guard in order to staff the polls. But this stopgap measure appears to have done little to prevent mass poll closures. In Milwaukee, for example, local election officials announced that there would be only five polling locations open — instead of the typical 180.




snip
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Only one person can stop it, but he won't do it LongtimeAZDem Apr 2020 #1
We don't live in a democracy anymore exboyfil Apr 2020 #2
How did Ohio get to move their primary and Wisconson cannot? samsingh Apr 2020 #3
In Ohio, Sir, The Courts Backed The Governor The Magistrate Apr 2020 #4
the corrupt courts strike again samsingh Apr 2020 #16
If voters cannot vote due to closed polls, I assume there will be another suit. Raven123 Apr 2020 #5
hey wisconsonites! the u of wisconsin badgers broadcast on 3 limbaugh stations that have been certainot Apr 2020 #6
Wait. Did or did not SCOTUS rule on it, too? I ask b/c I've not read which SC did, or if both did. ancianita Apr 2020 #7
both did, they both sided with the Rethugs (quelle surprise) nt Celerity Apr 2020 #9
Thanks. Now my anxiety grows about November. ancianita Apr 2020 #11
SCOTUS ruled against extended voting. Grown2Hate Apr 2020 #10
Maybe this will teach Bernie a lesson ... nolawarlock Apr 2020 #8
He might see that. He wouldn't endorse endangering people just because he wants delegates. ancianita Apr 2020 #12
You think he wouldn't? nolawarlock Apr 2020 #13
I'm not using accolades. It's basic human decency that must guide politics right now, and ancianita Apr 2020 #14
Well ... nolawarlock Apr 2020 #17
And as for my opinion of him ... nolawarlock Apr 2020 #18
This has nothing to do with Bernie. There's a critical state supreme court seat at stake liskddksil Apr 2020 #15
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Wisconsin's Supreme Court...»Reply #0