Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Martin O'Malley

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)

3. Interesting point. So why wouldn't the hierarchy prefer Wall Street Hillary to Obama?

Reply to CentralMass (Reply #2)

Sun May 31, 2015, 10:06 PM

May 2015

I don't understand that but Obama must have given them something Hillary could not or would not.
This is curious, even though we can only suppose at this point.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

who remembers the progression of primary 2008? i am not talking drama, trauma and dirt. [View all] seabeyond May 2015 OP

Appreciate you request leaving the dirt & drama out of this. misterhighwasted May 2015 #1

The party hierarchy pulled the rug out from under HRC's feet. CentralMass May 2015 #2

Interesting point. So why wouldn't the hierarchy prefer Wall Street Hillary to Obama? misterhighwasted May 2015 #3

i can only guess. Ted Kennedy and John Kerry were actively campaigning for Senator Obama CentralMass May 2015 #4

Not this Dem. Raine1967 May 2015 #6

Every party has issues, but I disagree that the Democratic party has lost the trust of its voters. FSogol Jun 2015 #8

+1 Raine1967 Jun 2015 #9

To your first point: That is not true. Raine1967 May 2015 #5

The 2008 democratic primary was appalling. CentralMass May 2015 #7