Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. The very worst offender of this practice is ... incorporated in Maryland. Ooops.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 02:36 PM
Nov 2015

And O'Malley was the governor while they plied their trade AND converted their business model into a trust to avoid taxes. I guess he's coming to Jesus, and that's fine, but it's a bit late:

Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), incorporated in Maryland and headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, is the largest owner of for-profit prisons and immigration detention facilities in the United States. The only larger operators of such facilities are “the federal government and three states,” according to CCA. [1] It is publicly traded in the United States (NYSE: CXW) and had approximately 15,400 employees in 2013.[2] In 2013, CCA was converted into a real estate investment trust (REIT), which will help the company avoid tens of millions of dollars in corporate taxes.[3][4] CCA's revenue in 2013 was nearly $1.7 billion, and it had profits of $300 million, 100 percent of which came from taxpayers via government contracts.[2]



http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Corrections_Corporation_of_America

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The very worst offender of this practice is ... incorporated in Maryland. Ooops. MADem Nov 2015 #1
They run prisons for the Federal Government, not for the State of Maryland. FSogol Nov 2015 #2
CCA was incorporated in 1983. Headquarters in Tennessee. No CCA prisons in Maryland. Koinos Nov 2015 #4
I understand that, but the optics remain poor. nt MADem Nov 2015 #5
LOL, the optics are poor? That's quite a stretch. O'Malley railed against the FSogol Nov 2015 #6
There are two facts at play, here: MADem Nov 2015 #7
In other States the immigrants were being held in for-profit prisons, that's FSogol Nov 2015 #8
Are you seriously trying to tell me that state governors ignore federal businesses MADem Nov 2015 #9
This is a group for O'Malley supporters. askew Nov 2015 #10
A few points: MADem Nov 2015 #11
So you aren't going to apologize for posting baseless attacks against O'Malley in the askew Nov 2015 #13
Your characterizations are "baseless." MADem Nov 2015 #14
Your comments aren't polite or respectful, they are pure bashing and FSogol Nov 2015 #15
If you can't take my remarks in the polite, open and honest way that I have offered them, MADem Nov 2015 #16
You think this was a polite comment? FSogol Nov 2015 #17
Which is why I asked--has he brought up this issue before? Or is he coming to Jesus? MADem Nov 2015 #18
You keep whining and making claims, but have not shown how it connects to O'malley. FSogol Nov 2015 #19
I have provided you a link that shows you where the largest offender is incorporated. MADem Nov 2015 #20
What does Marco Rubio have to do with O'Malley? FSogol Nov 2015 #21
If O'Malley gets the nomination (a long shot, but who knows?), Rubio could well be his opponent. MADem Nov 2015 #22
Laughably naive. FSogol Nov 2015 #23
Annnnnd.....straight to the personal insult! I could say the same about you. MADem Nov 2015 #24
And for the 4th time: Maryland doesn't use private prisons. FSogol Nov 2015 #25
They used to. MADem Nov 2015 #29
Stretchhhhhhhhh FSogol Nov 2015 #30
MO'M has a legacy problem WRT prison management. He does. MADem Nov 2015 #31
So, you try and prove your point by posting an article by a Hogan promoter? FSogol Nov 2015 #32
Some prison systems hire their own, state-employed, doctors and nurses. MADem Nov 2015 #33
Go make your unfounded allegations in some other group. n/t FSogol Nov 2015 #36
I assume that you did not realize you are posting in a protected group. Koinos Nov 2015 #3
I don't think you meant to talk to the person who started this thread, but that is what you are MADem Nov 2015 #12
You're right. It was directed at your first response. Koinos Nov 2015 #34
I don't understand tblue Nov 2015 #26
I misplaced my response. It was meant for Response #1. Koinos Nov 2015 #35
Good on O'Malley! K&R think Nov 2015 #27
Yes! elleng Nov 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»O'Malley: 'For-Profit' Pr...»Reply #1