Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

askew

(1,464 posts)
7. It isn't just Washington Times.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:12 PM
Jul 2015

The media has been pretty harsh on Hillary's plan. It's mostly all fluff. She doesn't really do much beyond what would happen naturally with the solar market. And she isn't addressing industrial or business carbon usage at all. The solar plan is solely fixed on residences. Plus, she is paying for it with tax credits which is ineffective.

O'Malley's plan is light-years beyond what Hillary is offering. And environmental activists are noticing Hillary's cheap talk and O'Malley's impressive plan.

Hillary refusing to commit to a position on Keystone just gave the media an in to really dig into her weak plan and expose it. Had she given an opinion on Keystone, the media would have likely just stuck to fluff stories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»Hillary Clinton talks big...»Reply #7