Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Martin O'Malley

(140,183 posts)

4. Exactly, and the non-environmentalists have studiously ignored it

Tue Jun 23, 2015, 12:00 PM

Jun 2015

because it would burden their dear carbon-related funders.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Very happy to K&R this. Raine1967 Jun 2015 #1

Yeah, that's true. It would create so many good jobs, our economy FSogol Jun 2015 #2

Exactly, and the non-environmentalists have studiously ignored it elleng Jun 2015 #4

Thanks. I xposted the article elleng Jun 2015 #3