Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Populists: support the Democratic Socialists of America! [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)22. Come on now. 
        I said replace "patrimonial wealth" with "inherited family wealth." I did not say replace an entire section of Picketty's book with the term "inherited family wealth." 
It has created what we call the "middle class" -- Tom Picketty's phrase "patrimonial middle class" is more precise, since we mean working people and small businessmen who have enough wealth to retire on and assist the kids.
By your own words, "patrimonial middle class" was not a widely-used and recognized term, like "middle class" alone. Rather, "patrimonial middle class" was a totally arbitrary term coined by Picketty, which he (or you?) defined to mean "working people and small businessmen who have enough wealth to retire on and assist the kids."
His arbitrary neologism and the definition of it are both male-centered, which does not reflect the reality of modern society. If anyone is going to choose a term arbitrarily and then define it, choosing a term and a definition that are not sexist is not that hard.
And, wtf, don't any small business people work? Why distinguish "working people" from small business people? And where does someone with a medical or legal practice fall? Are they covered by "patrimonial middle class" or not?
Moreover, does the term he coined include people who have enough to pass down to the kids after retirement because they themselves inherited family money, though not necessarily big bucks? Does his term really mean only anyone who has enough money to pass down to the kids after a comfortable retirement, regardless of how they acquired it? You've given me no way to know that. If that is all it means, the definition is off the mark.
If I know the answers to the questions I asked above, I can probably come up with a less sexist term and maybe a clearer definition, too.
There does seem to be a trade-off between gender-neutral language and clear writing,
Disagree. As I said, women own more than half the wealth in the US. They also own lots of small businesses and hold down a lot of jobs. Sometimes they are the only earners or owners of wealth in the nuclear family. Why should a term like "patrimonial middle class," which evokes wealth earned by and belonging to men, be considered more clear than a term that is more inclusive of female earners and female owners of wealth?
And, as my questions above indicate, I am not sure the term that you borrowed from Picketty is all that clear to someone who has not read the book.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							29 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        Thank you for that thoughtful post. Right now, the crushing of the middle class and the ignoring of
        merrily
        Jul 2015
        #2
      
        
        You don't often raise the floor without lowering the ceiling. It's a matter of speed and degree.
        merrily
        Jul 2015
        #8
      
        
        Agree:  People of all ages and of all kinds can and should unite for their shared vision.
        merrily
        Jul 2015
        #15
      
        
        I want to thank the alerter for bringing your OP to my attention, so I could req it.
        magical thyme
        Jul 2015
        #3
      
        
        Yet, the OP itself said that the DSAUSA is not a political party. In italics even.
        merrily
        Jul 2015
        #4
      
        
        and juror #2 took the time to research and confirm that the OP was correct
        magical thyme
        Jul 2015
        #5
      
        
        Like you, the DSAUSA believes in working within the existing Democratic Party structure.
        merrily
        Jul 2015
        #19
      
        
        Lol, 'all my base' belong to him too. But the idea of the Left infiltrating its own supposed
        sabrina 1
        Jul 2015
        #28
      
  