Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Turn Up the Heat! Hillary Campaign Needs to Champion Populism.... [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)12. I watched the 3rd Party Debates with intense interest in 2012.
They actually debated ISSUES, and had to answer questions.
It was enlightening, refreshing, and energizing.
I was amazed at how many important issues were "left out" of the MSM "debates"
because BOTH Parties agreed 100%....nothing to debate there so America doesn't have to know!
Here is what the League of Women Voters said about the Presidential Debates when they refused to be a part of the circus anymore.
In 1987, the LWV withdrew from debate sponsorship, in protest of the major party candidates attempting to dictate nearly every aspect of how the debates were conducted. On October 2, 1988, the LWV's 14 trustees voted unanimously to pull out of the debates, and on October 3 they issued a press release:
" The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."
According to the LWV, they pulled out because "the campaigns presented the League with their debate agreement on September 28, two weeks before the scheduled debate. The campaigns' agreement was negotiated 'behind closed doors' ... [with] 16 pages of conditions not subject to negotiation. Most objectionable to the League...were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings.... [including] control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_debates
" The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."
According to the LWV, they pulled out because "the campaigns presented the League with their debate agreement on September 28, two weeks before the scheduled debate. The campaigns' agreement was negotiated 'behind closed doors' ... [with] 16 pages of conditions not subject to negotiation. Most objectionable to the League...were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings.... [including] control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_debates
Let me repeat:
It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."
I would LOVE to see Hillary (or any other 3rd Way "Democrat"

with Rocky Anderson or Jill Stein.
They would tear her up and throw away the pieces.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

They are working on challenging Voter I.D. Laws, Campaign Finance Disclosure and other issues....
KoKo
Apr 2015
#20
that's really interesting flash from the past, so glad it's recorded. Did you see that vile look she
2banon
Apr 2015
#24
No matter what, I do believe populists will do exactly that. Enough is Enough!
mother earth
Apr 2015
#3
Why? She will say anything to get elected, then return to her DLC, corporatist, warhawk roots
peacebird
Apr 2015
#4
I totally agree. We may lose in the primary but we need to continue working to promote
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#28
I don't get why we are supposed to be impressed by Hillary parroting Elizabeth's words.
AtomicKitten
Apr 2015
#22