Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Which Corps/Products to Avoid and Which to Support [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)34. Starbucks is a chain and it pays low. On the other hand, it provides employees some benefits
        
          http://globalassets.starbucks.com/assets/9a06a16271f34d3b97636281f67bdb23.pdf
And it makes some efforts to be socially responsible.
http://www.starbucks.com/responsibility
So, it's not all one way.
Meanwhile, the local coffee shop we don't want to have to compete with Starbucks could for all we know, be paying employees "under the table," with no paid vacation or any other benefit, even Social Security contribution.
That is the fate of a relative of mine by marriage who works in a local laundromat in Connecticut because she is desperate for money and her English, while good in concept and vocabulary, is heavily accented. When the economy crashed, her dream was to get a job at Starbucks for the money first and the health insurance second, but they didn't hire her.
I own no stock in Starbucks and I don't even buy the coffee anymore, except in a pinch. (I am a coffee addict, so being out of coffee is a serious thing to me.)
I am just saying things are not always as clear cut and one-sided as they may seem.
          
          
          
        
        And it makes some efforts to be socially responsible.
http://www.starbucks.com/responsibility
So, it's not all one way.
Meanwhile, the local coffee shop we don't want to have to compete with Starbucks could for all we know, be paying employees "under the table," with no paid vacation or any other benefit, even Social Security contribution.
That is the fate of a relative of mine by marriage who works in a local laundromat in Connecticut because she is desperate for money and her English, while good in concept and vocabulary, is heavily accented. When the economy crashed, her dream was to get a job at Starbucks for the money first and the health insurance second, but they didn't hire her.
I own no stock in Starbucks and I don't even buy the coffee anymore, except in a pinch. (I am a coffee addict, so being out of coffee is a serious thing to me.)
I am just saying things are not always as clear cut and one-sided as they may seem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							43 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        I guess I opened this door by listing Pepsi, Coke, and Nestle.  It will be hard to
        rhett o rick
        Feb 2015
        #23
      
        
        Bob's Red Mill also has gluten free products for those of us that are so afflicted.
        Enthusiast
        Feb 2015
        #5
      
        
        Starbucks is a chain and it pays low. On the other hand, it provides employees some benefits
        merrily
        Apr 2015
        #34
      
        
        I use the 'Buycott' app on my smartphone to help guide me through the retail jungle.
        Snarkoleptic
        Feb 2015
        #11
      
        
        That's depressing. Good chart though. Too bad it can't be sent to every home so people see for
        sabrina 1
        Mar 2015
        #26
      
        
        Are these boycotted because they are associated with the Koch Crime Family (KCF)?  nm
        rhett o rick
        Feb 2015
        #17
      
        
        There are so few paper products that are not associated with the Kochs. I avoid those I know but
        sabrina 1
        Mar 2015
        #27
      
        
        I will look into that.  We may need another thread listing organizations and websites that support
        rhett o rick
        Feb 2015
        #22
      
        
        I don't know anything specifically but they are a huge conglomerate which is
        rhett o rick
        Mar 2015
        #31
      
        
        Good one. I do support Dr. Bronner.  There is a great documentary somewhere I've seen. nm
        rhett o rick
        Apr 2015
        #36
      
  