Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
9. A legal eagle you're not.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:27 PM
Jan 2015

"corporation is treated as a person for some purposes" but a natural person must be all in when it comes to my alter ego, the corporation. A legal person, corp., is an entity created in law with CERTAIN powers so its not and all or nothing and a natural person can be treated the same way when incorporating.

States set-up corps as the legislature chooses.

If a corp exists as a legal entity becoming a limited natural person simultaneously, then why can't a human being exist as a natural person and a limited corporation simultaneously. Therefore when we took the loan, we were acting as a dual existence. If it's good for the corps., it's good for us.

A corp. set-up for many to file class action bankruptcy.

Have you heard of "EMINENT DOMAIN" and the CT. case

"Campaign finance," Vote To Amend has said it would take many years to possibly accomplish. So your approach is to sit quiet for 10 years and cross your fingers for a constitutional amendment?

Your problem is your stuck in the box, you can't think out of the box. Whatever corporate society says, you follow and when a new approach comes forward you dismiss it because the existing powers tells you to.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»If one is another, why is...»Reply #9