Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)
14. Unfortunately, NO. I can't see where this is going
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 02:33 PM
Dec 2014

Picking a name may not be that important.
It all depends on what this "group" or "movement"
is working to achieve.

Initially it appeared that this was to be a movement
that intended to marshal Democratic resources
with the intent to effect change in the Democratic Party.

As a "Populist" movement it seemed to intone an approach
that would generate a "voice" outside of the establishment
to effect change within the party.
That is in contrast to lobbying sympathetic Congress Critters
to take up Populist positions.

At the most fundamental level, Populism would embrace
the hopes, dreams and desires of average middle of the road Americans.
Those hopes and dreams are inherently liberal and traditional Democratic values.
If reaching those citizens and voters is the target, the BRAND
should speak to those people in a way that reflects their interests.
The "Populist Wing of the Democratic Party" probably won't resonate
with those people.

The more that is posted here the more disparate the focus appears.
Perhaps that's my projection because I don't see any common thread
other than "progressive good, 3rd-Way bad".
Though I do sympathize with that sentiment,
I'm sorry if the tone sounds demeaning.
It just reflects the confusion.

So, no there's no specific name in mind.
If the goals of the movement were more apparent,
more distilled, the focus could improve.
And then again, maybe the name isn't that big of a deal?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't mind the "Party" tag, Kermitt Gribble Nov 2014 #1
My objection remains: I want a name that invokes PRINCIPLES not Personalities. scarletwoman Nov 2014 #3
I appreciate getting an explantion of what went down with the initial "naming" poll. scarletwoman Nov 2014 #2
Did all the hosts agree to these three choices? rhett o rick Nov 2014 #4
Each of our three hosts has signed off on the current list demwing Nov 2014 #5
Ok, I'm in. rhett o rick Nov 2014 #6
I like the last choice. F4lconF16 Dec 2014 #7
Reform is a tired, too often used term Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #8
I appreciate your opinion demwing Dec 2014 #9
Yep, it's just opinion Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #10
Could we maybe call it the New Deal Wing of the Dem Party? I know how angry the Third Way sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #11
Thats what is confusing? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #12
Let me cut to the chase demwing Dec 2014 #13
Unfortunately, NO. I can't see where this is going Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #14
The point of the group is to end the takeover of the Dem Party by Corporate sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #15
I am on your side, ok. Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #16
I think we agree. What this group is trying to do is to figure out to get that balance sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #17
Yes, your points deserve a thread of their own. Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #18
Your last sentence reminded me of a scene in Michael Moore's 'Capitalism, A Love Story'. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #19
Great post. Those among us that support HRC and the Third Way are afraid rhett o rick Dec 2014 #21
Honestly, as much as I believe FDR was the best Prez ever, Zorra Dec 2014 #20
Teddy Roosevelt jeepers Dec 2014 #22
I agree demwing Dec 2014 #23
It would make a good slogan jeepers Dec 2014 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»The "Name our Populi...»Reply #14