Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
14. Ahhh...Bucky Fuller...!
Sat Sep 13, 2014, 12:00 PM
Sep 2014

Here's a bit of interesting quotes from him which seem to be very prescient...But, then he was an incredible futurist. I would differ with his view on this one sentence: ".. all politicians can and will yield enthusiastically to the computers safe flight-controlling capabilities in bringing all of humanity in for a happy landing."

I don't get the connection between "happy landing" and politicians "yielding enthusiastically" but it's obvious that the Computer is now allowing global communities to talk with each other, share information and erasing boundaries of "specialization."

The rest seems to follow the use of computers going far past specialized use for mathematics and science...and has finally expanded into communication, education and expansion of creative expression which may lead to the societal change he envisioned.

I read him in my early 20's...and some of what he said was interesting but much else seemed "too far out" when I was that age. But, these quotes seem to eerily address my OP in some way. At least in my mind at this moment.

Thanks for the memory jog.

--------

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller

Synergy is the only word in our language which identifies the meaning for which it stands. Since the word is unknown to the average public, as I have already pointed out, it is not at all surprising that synergy has not been included in the economic accounting of our wealth transactions or in assessing our common wealth capabilities.

You may very appropriately want to ask me how we are going to resolve the ever-acceleratingly dangerous impasse of world-opposed politicians and ideological dogmas. I answer, it will be resolved by the computer.

While no politician or political system can ever afford to yield understandably and enthusiastically to their adversaries and opposers, all politicians can and will yield enthusiastically to the computers safe flight-controlling capabilities in bringing all of humanity in for a happy landing.

And------------------------

Introduction
The Wellspring of Reality


The youth of humanity all around our planet are intuitively revolting from all sovereignties and political ideologies.

We are in an age that assumes the narrowing trends of specialization to be logical, natural, and desirable. Consequently, society expects all earnestly responsible communication to be crisply brief. . . . In the meantime, humanity has been deprived of comprehensive understanding. Specialization has bred feelings of isolation, futility, and confusion in individuals. It has also resulted in the individual's leaving responsibility for thinking and social action to others. Specialization breeds biases that ultimately aggregate as international and ideological discord, which, in turn, leads to war.

Lack of knowledge concerning all the factors and the failure to include them in our integral imposes false conclusions.

There is an inherently minimum set of essential concepts and current information, cognizance of which could lead to our operating our planet Earth to the lasting satisfaction and health of all humanity.

We must start with scientific fundamentals, and that means with the data of experiments and not with assumed axioms predicated only upon the misleading nature of that which only superficially seems to be obvious. It is the consensus of great scientists that science is the attempt to set in order the facts of experience.

The word generalization in literature usually means covering too much territory too thinly to be persuasive, let alone convincing. In science, however, a generalization means a principle that has been found to hold true in every special case. ... The principle of leverage is a scientific generalization.

Quite clearly, our task is predominantly metaphysical, for it is how to get all of humanity to educate itself swiftly enough to generate spontaneous social behaviors that will avoid extinction.

The physical is inherently entropic, giving off energy in ever more disorderly ways. The metaphysical is antientropic, methodically marshalling energy. Life is antientropic. It is spontaneously inquisitive. It sorts out and endeavors to understand.

We are now synergetically forced to conclude that all phenomena are metaphysical; wherefore, as many have long suspected — like it or not — "life is but a dream."

The wellspring of reality is the family of weightless generalized principles.

It is essential to release humanity from the false fixations of yesterday, which seem now to bind it to a rationale of action leading only to extinction.

The youth of humanity all around our planet are intuitively revolting from all sovereignties and political ideologies.
The youth of Earth are moving intuitively toward an utterly classless, raceless, omnicooperative, omniworld humanity. Children freed of the ignorantly founded educational traditions and exposed only to their spontaneously summoned, computer-stored and -distributed outflow of reliable-opinion-purged, experimentally verified data, shall indeed lead society to its happy egress from all misinformedly conceived, fearfully and legally imposed, and physically enforced customs of yesterday. They can lead all humanity into omnisuccessful survival as well as entrance into an utterly new era of human experience in an as-yet and ever-will-be fundamentally mysterious Universe.

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Recommended. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #1
Rather than dwell over the time it takes to get "More & Better Dems" KoKo Sep 2014 #8
The battlefield between us and #3 is pretty much the same as the "general battlefield"... NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #9
Yes...you might want to explain that Tombstone.... KoKo Sep 2014 #10
I recommend any work by Lawrence Lessig, like Free Culture. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #11
Bill Moyers did an Excellent Interview with Lessing... KoKo Sep 2014 #12
I fear that people miss the the point of government. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #13
Ahhh...Bucky Fuller...! KoKo Sep 2014 #14
I do not think either party is going to give up all of that money. djean111 Sep 2014 #2
Well said...and as we go forward...TRUTH OUTS.... KoKo Sep 2014 #5
Anyone have a Link to Confronting FCC to get MONEY RESTRICTED in POLITICS? KoKo Sep 2014 #3
The "limit the ads" part would be unconstitutional under current interpretations Jim Lane Sep 2014 #15
Given that there is a Monopoly of Three Cable Providers KoKo Sep 2014 #16
Broadcast is different because of scarcity of spectrum space. Jim Lane Sep 2014 #17
I did some more research....This goes back to Clinton/Gore Commission KoKo Sep 2014 #18
BTW...this Article is a Very Long Read...(An Over the weekend Project) KoKo Sep 2014 #4
I agree with the article. But this is not to say we shouldn't use every tactic at our rhett o rick Sep 2014 #6
check out my Post #3....there was a movement to do this... KoKo Sep 2014 #7
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»Why It's Delusional to Th...»Reply #14