Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Elizabeth Warren
In reply to the discussion: The Hill: Why Elizabeth Warren should be the next president [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)20. He also wrote 'Elizabeth Warren: An Honest and Courageous Woman..."
Elizabeth Warren: An Honest and Courageous Woman in a Cowardly and Centrist Democratic Party
What does the Democratic Party stand for nowadays?
We're the Anti-war Party, right?
Okay, stop laughing.
We're a foil to the corporatists in the GOP, correct? We'll stand up for the middle class and ensure that the same people who caused the financial collapse in 2008 won't hurt us once more, right?
We're different from Lindsay Graham, who stated the following about Elizabeth Warren's refusal to accept a spending bill that caters to Wall Street interests:
"If you follow the lead of the senator of Massachusetts ... people are not going to believe you are mature enough to run the place," Graham said. "Don't follow her lead. She's the problem."
We're brave enough, as a political party, to stand up to the snide comment of a Republican leader in the Senate, aren't we?
Nope, try again.
Instead, we've proven that we can indeed "run the place" in the manner the GOP and Wall Street deem commendable. The cowardice of cold pragmatism rules the Democratic Party in 2014. Compromise is great, but just don't compromise the economy in the name of bargaining or reaching across the aisle.
Some true believing liberals might say that Democrats represent the eloquence and determination of Sen. Elizabeth Warren. In an NPR Interview, Warren highlights the points introduced in her now legendary Senate floor speech:
...o, Citigroup and other Wall Street lobbyists practically write a provision in a spending bill (that increases their profits while ensuring higher risk in their activities) meant to ensure this nation continues to function properly.
The outrage among leading liberals was felt throughout the nation, right?
Furor over the president's capitulation to Lindsay Graham Republicans and fat cats on Wall Street caused even the probable Democratic nominee to defend a liberal standing up to the GOP and investment banks, correct?
Keep dreaming. All you heard was the deafening silence of centrists....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/elizabeth-warren-an-hones_b_6338522.html
What does the Democratic Party stand for nowadays?
We're the Anti-war Party, right?
Okay, stop laughing.
We're a foil to the corporatists in the GOP, correct? We'll stand up for the middle class and ensure that the same people who caused the financial collapse in 2008 won't hurt us once more, right?
We're different from Lindsay Graham, who stated the following about Elizabeth Warren's refusal to accept a spending bill that caters to Wall Street interests:
"If you follow the lead of the senator of Massachusetts ... people are not going to believe you are mature enough to run the place," Graham said. "Don't follow her lead. She's the problem."
We're brave enough, as a political party, to stand up to the snide comment of a Republican leader in the Senate, aren't we?
Nope, try again.
Instead, we've proven that we can indeed "run the place" in the manner the GOP and Wall Street deem commendable. The cowardice of cold pragmatism rules the Democratic Party in 2014. Compromise is great, but just don't compromise the economy in the name of bargaining or reaching across the aisle.
Some true believing liberals might say that Democrats represent the eloquence and determination of Sen. Elizabeth Warren. In an NPR Interview, Warren highlights the points introduced in her now legendary Senate floor speech:
...o, Citigroup and other Wall Street lobbyists practically write a provision in a spending bill (that increases their profits while ensuring higher risk in their activities) meant to ensure this nation continues to function properly.
The outrage among leading liberals was felt throughout the nation, right?
Furor over the president's capitulation to Lindsay Graham Republicans and fat cats on Wall Street caused even the probable Democratic nominee to defend a liberal standing up to the GOP and investment banks, correct?
Keep dreaming. All you heard was the deafening silence of centrists....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/elizabeth-warren-an-hones_b_6338522.html
I think he nails the differences between "centrists" (conservadems) & the populist party we believe the Democratic party to be.
We have a real problem with some Democrats campaigning as Democrats but acting like rethugs in office.
I appreciate his insight.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Hey Enthusiast, I don't think its possible for me to adequately express in typed words
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#12
No kidding. The TPP does bring change, but not hope unless you're a millionaire.
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#30
I agree! Liz needs to be right where she is, at least through the end of her term.
maddiemom
Dec 2014
#14
If she runs for president and doesn't make it, whe's in the Senate until 2018 n/t
eridani
Dec 2014
#28
Elizebeth Warren is as great as one person can be, so is Bernie Sanders and a few others who
Dustlawyer
Dec 2014
#6
We need a president who is a 360 degree president, one who can take information from a
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#26
Another reason she should be our next prez is for renewable energy progress...
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#31