Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
19. I still wear hearing protection while using a suppressor.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 09:39 PM
Feb 2015

On many guns, the suppressor only lowers the noise level to "won't make your ears bleed" levels.

An unsuppressed AR-15, for example is about 150-160 db. With a good suppressor, it's about 120-130 db. That is still VERY LOUD. In fact, you still need to wear hearing protection, but you don't have to wear both plugs AND muffs. You could take a few shots without protection and not do too much damage.

HOWEVER, you ARE able to get the sound down to safe levels with good plugs or muffs, and you are much less likely to cause inadvertent hearing damage to people nearby, and you're much less likely to annoy the folks living close to the range.... or near your hunting ground (though I am not a hunter).

Sound suppressors are one of those things that SHOULD be uncontroversial. They aren't really well suited to crime, since good ones are expensive, and they make the weapon very difficult to conceal, and don't offer the covert shooting capability think they do. But as with everything associated with guns, it's not really about the facts, but the emotions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bet their victims will experience permanent hearing loss. GeorgeGist Feb 2015 #1
In case they need to assassinate a deer mwrguy Feb 2015 #2
Unregulated in Norway Marengo Feb 2015 #6
Yes. mwrguy Feb 2015 #8
Apparently Not... Marengo Feb 2015 #9
Aren't you in the wrong Group? billh58 Feb 2015 #14
If it's not permitted to challenge misconceptions and ignorance regarding suppressors, Marengo Feb 2015 #24
"Suppressors", not 'silencers', reduce the noise of a gunshot from approx 160 decibels Aristus Feb 2015 #3
Sticking them up their ass would be a cheap fix. TheCowsCameHome Feb 2015 #4
Now Bubba won't wake up billh58 Feb 2015 #5
The bill’s sponsor is Rep. Brandon Phelps billh58 Feb 2015 #7
Good luck that is SO Ill territory mikeysnot Feb 2015 #26
What a disgrace! Mindfreak7 Feb 2015 #10
Bub bye "comrade" billh58 Feb 2015 #15
With so many well reasoned arguments already posted here on why they should be banned how could clffrdjk Feb 2015 #11
You got it right.... Adrahil Feb 2015 #13
I don't think that you billh58 Feb 2015 #16
He sounded sarcastic to me... Adrahil Feb 2015 #17
"For civilians they are mainly useful to aid hearing protection and reduce nuisance noise" billh58 Feb 2015 #18
I still wear hearing protection while using a suppressor. Adrahil Feb 2015 #19
There's that technical billh58 Feb 2015 #20
I'm not talking about how great they are, or even if they are desirable. That's a separate issue. Adrahil Feb 2015 #22
I've been following this thread, and I understand your point regarding silencers. Electric Monk Feb 2015 #23
Bub bye billh58 Feb 2015 #25
Have a great day! n/t Adrahil Feb 2015 #27
it is amazing how obvious sarcasim can go over some heads clffrdjk Feb 2015 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2015 #12
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Illinois bill would allow...»Reply #19