From a link in the OP article:
- Snip -
That, of course, is the point. In a study published in 1993 in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers found that the presence of a gun in a home significantly increased the risks of homicide and suicide. (A finding seemingly borne out in the case of Nancy Lanza, the mother of the Newtown killer, who was murdered with her own gun.) The study was compelling, thought-provoking and attention-grabbing. Was it conclusive? Hardly.
But rather than trust in scientific principle and a free marketplace of ideas to sort through the data, the gun lobby mobilized to snuff out such research altogether.
The effort was remarkably successful. In 1996, Republican Representative Jay Dickey of Arkansas pushed an amendment cutting $2.6 million from the budget of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The import of the amendment was lost on no one. The CDC had spent $2.6 million on gun research the year before. Thereafter, the CDC was expressly prohibited from using funds to advocate or promote gun control.
A subsequent effort, by Republican Representative Denny Rehberg of Montana, applied similar restrictions to the National Institutes of Health.
These are the results of the gun lobbys storied political muscle. They are not, however, the actions of a political movement confident that history, data or reason itself can support its agenda. Truth doesnt fear information.
The Newtown massacre may mark a turning point in Americas tragic gun politics. Yet even under the most optimistic scenario, the quest for reasonable gun laws will be a lengthy, difficult battle. Its best if all sides are well-armed with facts.
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2012-12-20/why-does-the-nra-fear-the-truth-about-gun-violence-
The right-wing gun lobby doesn't like research that doesn't support its views that guns are not a problem in this country, but that people are the problem. "If people would just stop committing suicide, there would be no problem at all" -- and who needs any stinking "scientific research" to agree with that Second Amendment absolutist gem of wisdom?