Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
19. Addendum Clarification.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:23 PM
Feb 2012

The history of female characters in theater before the modern era is very complicated one. Only in modern drama did women take on more significant and positive roles. By an large female characters have been negatively treated. What I failed to mention in my last post which was admittedly a bit scattered is that theater and the arts operates in the context of the time that the theater is created.

How women were treated in those earlier times is consistent with the theater of the day. Women had no rights throughout most of history. In the medieval period they were sometimes burned as witches. Women were just property. Even most royal women could not own property. Male heirs were supreme. In Elizabethan and Restoration and even Victorian England women could not own property. Women who were widowed were assigned an overseer of their husbands property and if they passed the property went to the property overseer and NOT her children. The only way a woman prospered was if she married a man of means. Women have been at the bottom of the totem pole for most of history. Women for the most part have never had the right to vote.

It took 5 decades after the Civil War in the US to get the right to vote. During WWI women protested outside the White house. They were jailed and mistreated. Some were force fed and tortured while on hunger strike. And the Women's Suffrage Amendment passed by ONLY one vote with a last minute change. Even after 5 decades suffrage was facing almost certain failure. And the GOP was against suffrage and too many male Democrats were as well.

I am trying to vastly summarize hundreds of years of history. I hope I am clear enough.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes; Yes; could be. Depends on the circumstances. elleng Feb 2012 #1
clarification, please... are you answering in order? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #3
In order: elleng Feb 2012 #13
ok. thanks Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #14
Is it just another way to dismiss a female debate? PDJane Feb 2012 #2
thank you for the comment. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #4
I've seen this comment from males Warpy Feb 2012 #5
thank you for the comment Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #8
"Tone argument" Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #6
thank you for the link and the quote. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #10
Different rhetorical styles appeal to different people. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #7
thank you for the comment. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #11
You're welcome. Thanks for the thread. nt ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #21
Anger Is Justified TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #9
ok...question for clarification Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #12
Needs No Context TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #17
thank you very much for a well reasoned and thoughtful reply and the history of Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #18
Addendum Clarification. TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #19
yes, and you are explaining how theatre works within the confines of reflecting Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #20
Mores In Context TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #22
That depends ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #15
refer to comment #9 (and my reply #12) on this thread, please -- Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #16
I would take that comment as an invitation to respond with a kick to the groin. laconicsax Feb 2012 #23
thank you for the comment. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #28
Depends on the context. JoeyT Feb 2012 #24
thank you for the comment Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #29
I think context really is important and here's why justiceischeap Feb 2012 #25
it was the second. thanks Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #26
"You'd be angry too if you were held to a completely different standard because of your gender." CrispyQ Feb 2012 #27
thank you for the comment Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #30
The problem is that women are not supposed to get angry Nikia Feb 2012 #31
Often, it is. gkhouston Feb 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Feminism and Diversity»how seriously would you t...»Reply #19