Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
15. That depends
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 08:37 PM
Feb 2012
can passion for a cause be misinterpreted to be anger?
Of course, it depends on the circumstances

can righteous anger be misconstrued?

Yes, it depends on the circumstances

is it just another way to dismiss a female argument/debate as being invalid?
May or may not be, depending on circumstances.

You are reducing human communication, something complex and nuanced, to a binary question without context. Not sure what kind of validation you are looking for, but whatever comes of this thread, it is not going to be particularly valid. Context is always critical

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes; Yes; could be. Depends on the circumstances. elleng Feb 2012 #1
clarification, please... are you answering in order? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #3
In order: elleng Feb 2012 #13
ok. thanks Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #14
Is it just another way to dismiss a female debate? PDJane Feb 2012 #2
thank you for the comment. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #4
I've seen this comment from males Warpy Feb 2012 #5
thank you for the comment Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #8
"Tone argument" Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #6
thank you for the link and the quote. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #10
Different rhetorical styles appeal to different people. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #7
thank you for the comment. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #11
You're welcome. Thanks for the thread. nt ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #21
Anger Is Justified TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #9
ok...question for clarification Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #12
Needs No Context TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #17
thank you very much for a well reasoned and thoughtful reply and the history of Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #18
Addendum Clarification. TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #19
yes, and you are explaining how theatre works within the confines of reflecting Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #20
Mores In Context TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #22
That depends ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #15
refer to comment #9 (and my reply #12) on this thread, please -- Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #16
I would take that comment as an invitation to respond with a kick to the groin. laconicsax Feb 2012 #23
thank you for the comment. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #28
Depends on the context. JoeyT Feb 2012 #24
thank you for the comment Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #29
I think context really is important and here's why justiceischeap Feb 2012 #25
it was the second. thanks Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #26
"You'd be angry too if you were held to a completely different standard because of your gender." CrispyQ Feb 2012 #27
thank you for the comment Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #30
The problem is that women are not supposed to get angry Nikia Feb 2012 #31
Often, it is. gkhouston Feb 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Feminism and Diversity»how seriously would you t...»Reply #15