Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What went wrong with the Democratic Party? Three big failures that led to the current debacle [View all]SMC22307
(8,090 posts)19. Mistake 2: Unrequited Bipartisanship
Oh, Lordy, how many times on this board were Obama, Pelosi, et al. criticized for that?
....
The failure of Democrats to realize how deep the Republican commitment to opposing their agenda runs has led to strategic errors. Take the earliest battles of Obamas presidency, when he extended a hand to House Speaker John Boehner, only to have Boehner leave the table at the last minute. Or granting concessions (more than $1 trillion in spending cuts, with no tax increases) to the Republicans during the high-stakes debt ceiling negotiations in 2011, which only emboldened Republicans to pursue the tactic again in 2013. As the Onion perfectly satirized, Obama: Debt Ceiling Deal Required Tough Concessions by Both Democrats and Democrats Alike. In a Health Affairs article, Helen Halpin (who advised the Obama administration on the development of the Affordable Care Act) and Peter Harbage note that Sen. Max Baucus spent months trying to forge a bipartisan bill, sapping precious time that Democrats simply didnt have.
This flows from the Democratic desire for bipartisan policy, but also from a technocratic disposition. Many liberal commentators are holding up Trumps support among beneficiaries of the Affordable Care Act to claim that the idea that policies would become entrenched is fundamentally wrong. In fact, its right the problem is that ACA was not properly designed to mobilize political support for it. The administration failed to use the exchanges to register voters (as they were required to by the National Voter Registration Act). Where the Medicaid expansion passed, it did indeed mobilize turnout.
Research is further establishing the feedback loop between progressive policy and Democratic vote share, not debunking it. The fallacy lies in believing that programs will simply mobilize people by dint of their existence. In reality, of course, most Americans arent schooled in policy. Institutions like unions and community organizations (like ACORN) traditionally mobilize these beneficiaries. Social Security privatization didnt work because groups like the AARP have cropped up to defend these benefits.
....
http://www.salon.com/2017/01/08/what-went-wrong-with-the-democratic-party-three-big-failures-that-led-to-the-current-debacle/
The failure of Democrats to realize how deep the Republican commitment to opposing their agenda runs has led to strategic errors. Take the earliest battles of Obamas presidency, when he extended a hand to House Speaker John Boehner, only to have Boehner leave the table at the last minute. Or granting concessions (more than $1 trillion in spending cuts, with no tax increases) to the Republicans during the high-stakes debt ceiling negotiations in 2011, which only emboldened Republicans to pursue the tactic again in 2013. As the Onion perfectly satirized, Obama: Debt Ceiling Deal Required Tough Concessions by Both Democrats and Democrats Alike. In a Health Affairs article, Helen Halpin (who advised the Obama administration on the development of the Affordable Care Act) and Peter Harbage note that Sen. Max Baucus spent months trying to forge a bipartisan bill, sapping precious time that Democrats simply didnt have.
This flows from the Democratic desire for bipartisan policy, but also from a technocratic disposition. Many liberal commentators are holding up Trumps support among beneficiaries of the Affordable Care Act to claim that the idea that policies would become entrenched is fundamentally wrong. In fact, its right the problem is that ACA was not properly designed to mobilize political support for it. The administration failed to use the exchanges to register voters (as they were required to by the National Voter Registration Act). Where the Medicaid expansion passed, it did indeed mobilize turnout.
Research is further establishing the feedback loop between progressive policy and Democratic vote share, not debunking it. The fallacy lies in believing that programs will simply mobilize people by dint of their existence. In reality, of course, most Americans arent schooled in policy. Institutions like unions and community organizations (like ACORN) traditionally mobilize these beneficiaries. Social Security privatization didnt work because groups like the AARP have cropped up to defend these benefits.
....
http://www.salon.com/2017/01/08/what-went-wrong-with-the-democratic-party-three-big-failures-that-led-to-the-current-debacle/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

What went wrong with the Democratic Party? Three big failures that led to the current debacle [View all]
lancelyons
Jan 2017
OP
There is only one thing that went wrong in the 2016 presidential election and had little to do with
Trust Buster
Jan 2017
#1
The op tells precisely why so few people voted. They gave up on the democrats.
George Eliot
Jan 2017
#2
Sorry, I'm not buying it. You didn't have to be a fan of the Democratic Party to know that Trump
Trust Buster
Jan 2017
#3
fine, but stomping our feet and screaming "not fair" isn't gonna fix it. Even if it's not fair.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2017
#9
You're right, I advocate doing something strange.. very strange like ... calling the capital police
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#10
OK, how are we going to win back anything if Russia can hack every election?!? Are they going to ...
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#12
There isnt any evidence, I've seen, that they hacked the physical vote count.
LenaBaby61
Jan 2017
#36
Please read the report, they hacked the state and local election board in serveral states and that
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#41
OK, how are we going to win back anything if Russia can hack every election?!?
LenaBaby61
Jan 2017
#34
we need all paper ballots, all hand-counted, all the time. it's not that hard. nt
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#46
maybe, yes. But it's undeniable that the electorate in general is trending in certain directions.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2017
#22
WA isn't so safe. Our state house has several blue dog Dems-we pay the price by getting little done.
snowy owl
Jan 2017
#24
Agreed. Big changes are necessary and it isn't personalities. Policies have to change.
snowy owl
Jan 2017
#26
4: Taking the West Coast for granted & ignoring cannabis/treating the issue like a big joke
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2017
#4
I think part of the problem is, these beltway conventional wisdom consultants are largely
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2017
#37
4: Minimize effect of comey, russia and voter suppression in analysis and blame the victim
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#6
The points raised in the article have to do with the Republican Party's ability...
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#25
Dems play too nice--even the Pres. who I still greatly admire/respect played too nice with the GOP.
LenaBaby61
Jan 2017
#40
Good (albeit embarrassing) article. I'm still miffed about what was allowed to happen to ACORN.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#14
Me, too. And remember the black official that Obama fired without knowing full story.
snowy owl
Jan 2017
#28
I think purists who discard the good for the perfect can be problematic. However...
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#32