Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
13. That's the problem with the "No one should be allowed to critically examine HRC's campaign" line.
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 08:22 PM
Dec 2016

The fact of the matter is, she lost. Doesn't matter whether it's fair, doesn't matter whether she got more votes, doesn't matter if all these factors were lined up against her. I mean, those things DO matter, but not in the one big way that really counts; namely, on Jan 21 the person in the oval office is gonna be the person who won the contest as it is set up.

So of course she could have done better, just like Al Gore and John Kerry could have done better. They could have done better enough to actually win the part that counts.

If there's no room for improvement, we're screwed, because this level of performance isn't gonna cut it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Yes, Clinton won more vot...»Reply #13