Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Another thing I don't get is progressives who love Tulsi Gabbard but rail against blue dogs [View all]La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)73. there was no reason for that allegation, not a shred of proof, not a single thing.
        it's like my merely asking 'do you think bernie tried to sabotage hillary, so he could be in news till his dying breath'. maybe it sounds legitimate to some people as a question, but for most it reads like an unfounded allegation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							96 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
                        Another thing I don't get is progressives who love Tulsi Gabbard but rail against blue dogs [View all]
							La Lioness Priyanka
							Dec 2016
							OP
                        
        
        I try not to expect consistent beliefs of anyone at either extreme of the political spectrum.
        LonePirate
        Dec 2016
        #2
      
        
        actually most liberals in india do. i know this because i am from india and have a large set of
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #52
      
        
        Not to pick nits, i think that classifies as more of a slaughter or massacre than a genocide
        dionysus
        Dec 2016
        #81
      
        
        there is still hope gabbard will take a job with the trump admin so we can get a real progressive nt
        msongs
        Dec 2016
        #5
      
        
        oh god. that's not a real thing is it? i heard that it maybe true for heidi heitcamp
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #6
      
        
        In the case of Tulsi, it comes down to she endorsed Sanders. Nothing else matters, not her record
        KittyWampus
        Dec 2016
        #16
      
        
        You're not going back far enough.   Stop quoting the recent stuff, when her profile was raised.
        MADem
        Dec 2016
        #45
      
        
        Her father is a Roman Catholic.   She learned a lot of her hate at her daddy's knee.
        MADem
        Dec 2016
        #64
      
        
        I simply pointed out her father's religion as a counterpoint to your assumption that I felt
        MADem
        Dec 2016
        #66
      
        
        I don't know why she thinks as she does.   She  is a Muslim - hater, though.  Her comments
        MADem
        Dec 2016
        #84
      
        
        yeah, the love of Tulsi is unwarranted. if that's the best the dems can do from her district
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #68
      
        
        No one with a brain thinks that pipeline is a smart idea.  Doesn't make them "liberal."
        MADem
        Dec 2016
        #78
      
        
        Only about a dozen in Congress signed that letter of protest to President Obama
        oberliner
        Dec 2016
        #79
      
        
        She "modified" those public positions because her attitudes weren't selling in her district.
        MADem
        Dec 2016
        #85
      
        
        Probably not - but I do appreciate you taking the time to engage in this conversation
        oberliner
        Dec 2016
        #94
      
        
        Is there supposed to be a difference, now?  In the past, people used the term progressive
        dionysus
        Dec 2016
        #82
      
        
        GIRL! I got a hide a week back cause I pointed out Tulsi loves guns and hates Muslims...
        KittyWampus
        Dec 2016
        #14
      
        
        First we need to recognized she endorsed Sanders. After that, many other things make sense.
        KittyWampus
        Dec 2016
        #17
      
        
        I seem to remember a young man named Barack Obama who did pretty well for himself
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #47
      
        
        probably that as the field goes our choices suck? Its better to choose candidates that are at least
        JCanete
        Dec 2016
        #26
      
        
        She's a favorite of Bannon's for God's sake. Why would we even entertain trusting . . .
        brush
        Dec 2016
        #42
      
        
        I think you didn't read my post, where i clearly said, if thats the best we can do in that district
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #46
      
        
        Missed it. totally with you on that then. Are there those who are doing that, or just those
        JCanete
        Dec 2016
        #48
      
        
        the chair should only remain ONLY as long as it's mathematically possible for someone to win
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #55
      
        
        i am saying that had she been a clinton supporter your words would be far harsher toward Tulsi
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #62
      
        
        yes, and I am not saying you have to vilify her. it's your attitude towards Cuomo
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #67
      
        
        there was no reason for that allegation, not a shred of proof, not a single thing.
        La Lioness Priyanka
        Dec 2016
        #73