Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
16. OMG, good point (And I mean more than just the 8/9 typo)!!!!
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 07:40 PM
Dec 2016

The power of the executive to declare martial law is inherent in the President's role as commander and chief and resided within the head of the military at common law at the time of the Founding.

The great part of your observation is that even Section 9 limits only Congress' power to suspend the Writ (which is explained in Milligan) and in a different way in Felker.

The question then arises whether the Constitution limits the President's power to suspend the writ. The answer to that question is easier. Because we are a government of enumerated powers, the Constitution would have to limit the President's power to suspend the Writ ONLY if it had granted him ANY power to do so in the first place. Unlike the power to impose martial law, which is (implicitly) enumerated in Article II, Section 2, nowhere does the Constitution grant the power to suspend the Writ the executive.

Of course, this all leaves open the question whether the executive can impose martial law during a time of civil unrest, insurrection, etc. (although history teaches that he/she can). More importantly, it leaves open the thornier questions of whether Our President could do so in the event it is revealed that our elections had been corrupted by a Trump/Putting conspiracy AND the one upon which people most disagree, should he do so.

Again, thanks!!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A question for lawyers an...»Reply #16