Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
9. That's the way it is now.
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 12:43 PM
Dec 2016

But the court's might start chipping away at the system, beginning with the way th EC is apportioned. If they decide to do it according to district, rather than by a state aggregate, the presidential election process would change, with different campaign strategies, etc. What might follow from that? An end to single member districts in some states? Sounds impossible, but we could experience some odd things in the next four years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton could hav...»Reply #9