Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Dangerous Myth That Hillary Clinton Ignored the Working Class [View all]
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/12/hillary-clinton-working-class/509477/Perhaps the clearest takeaway from the November election for many liberals is that Hillary Clinton lost because she ignored the working class.
In the days after her shocking loss, Democrats complained that Clinton had no jobs agenda. A widely shared essay in The Nation blamed Clinton's "neoliberalism" for abandoning the voters who swung the election. I come from the white working class, Bernie Sanders said on CBS This Morning, and I am deeply humiliated that the Democratic Party cannot talk to where I came from.
But here is the troubling reality for civically minded liberals looking to justify their preferred strategies: Hillary Clinton talked about the working class, middle class jobs, and the dignity of work constantly. And she still lost.
She detailed plans to help coal miners and steel workers. She had decades of ideas to help parents, particularly working moms, and their children. She had plans to help young men who were getting out of prison and old men who were getting into new careers. She talked about the dignity of manufacturing jobs, the promise of clean-energy jobs, and the Obama administrations record of creating private-sector jobs for a record-breaking number of consecutive months. She said the word job more in the Democratic National Convention speech than Trump did in the RNC acceptance speech; she mentioned the word jobs more during the first presidential debate than Trump did. She offered the most comprehensively progressive economic platform of any presidential candidate in historyone specifically tailored to an economy powered by an educated workforce.
I think it's important to get the right lesson from this election... I think this article shows pretty clearly that the election wasn't lost simply on the issue of jobs for the working class.
It was obviously a complex freaky election, and I think the biggest factors for Hillary losing were 1) decades of right-wing smears on Hillary, 2) the overblown email scandal and Comey, and 3) wikileaks and Russian interference.
IMHO.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Dangerous Myth That Hillary Clinton Ignored the Working Class [View all]
Fast Walker 52
Dec 2016
OP
Mind boggling to see liberals parrot this myth. We happily give our opponents BS talking points..
JHan
Dec 2016
#3
I disagree. She talked to them, but not with them. Her other problem was messaging.
Exilednight
Dec 2016
#10
I got to meet Hillary at one of the very first stops on her listening tour in 1999.
lapucelle
Dec 2016
#47
The problem is that Trump didn't ignore them either, and he won over more...
Buckeye_Democrat
Dec 2016
#5
Which Rust Belt location was that? If not in that area it's irrelevant.
NoGoodNamesLeft
Dec 2016
#25
What, are you Kelly Conway? Why did you ignore the question and deflect?
NoGoodNamesLeft
Dec 2016
#43
yeah, Dems really need to stop reacting to RW memes and set their own media narrative
Fast Walker 52
Dec 2016
#36
I think few outside of the faithful were overly impressed with any plans made she went up
TheKentuckian
Dec 2016
#42
There are ways in which I think, not Clinton specifically, but the party at large
JCanete
Dec 2016
#32