Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(149,488 posts)
13. Well, that was the result of our partial democracy, anyhow.
Thu Dec 1, 2016, 04:55 PM
Dec 2016

We are not a democracy, actually. We are a constitutional republic. We elect our President in an unusual way that uses electors to balance out the influence of the most populous states. That system was designed when we had far fewer states and a population of about 5 million people. It is outdated and should be replaced, in my opinion, by a national popular vote, taken in a universal election system that occurs in all 50 states, using the same ballots and the same counting system.

But, that is not how we do it, nor how we did it in 2016. We did it according to the Constitution.

We simply failed to elect Hillary Clinton under that system We could have done so, but we did not, by a small margin in about three states. We failed, not Hillary. We failed to get the votes we needed in every state. The shame is on us.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We had an election. There...»Reply #13