Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeyondGeography

(40,557 posts)
23. Sam Stein wrote a pretty definitive autopsy, if that one doesn't work for you
Thu Dec 1, 2016, 12:47 AM
Dec 2016
In Michigan alone, a senior battleground state operative told HuffPost that the state party and local officials were running at roughly one-tenth the paid canvasser capacity that Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) had when he ran for president in 2004. Desperate for more human capital, the state party and local officials ended up raising $300,000 themselves to pay 500 people to help canvass in the election’s closing weeks. By that point, however, they were operating in the dark. One organizer said that in a precinct in Flint, they were sent to a burned down trailer park. No one had taken it off the list of places to visit because no one had been there until the final weekend. Clinton lost the state by 12,000 votes.

...As Democrats begin to repair their party and learn from the shortcomings of the Clinton campaign, one of the primary arguments being made is that candidates have to show up if they expect to win. Obama said as much in a recent press conference when he tied his success in Iowa to the sheer number of stops he made in the state while campaigning. And the data strongly suggests that this was a vulnerability for Clinton. As the Washington Post reported, Clinton’s campaign and outside groups supporting it aired more television ads in Omaha during the closing weeks than in Michigan and Wisconsin combined. And as NBC News reported, during the final 100 days of the election, Trump made 133 visits to Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, Michigan and Wisconsin while Clinton made 87

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-campaign-neglect_us_582cacb0e4b058ce7aa8b861


There is still a lot of reporting yet to be done on the quality of the supporting data operation (at least I haven't seen any), but it's obvious they weren't within miles of Obama 2012 in terms of understanding their voters and anticipating the outcome. You can read alll about that here:

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/509026/how-obamas-team-used-big-data-to-rally-voters/



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If only we had trusted Clinton instead of looking at her history. el_bryanto Dec 2016 #1
I suppose next time we should pick the candidate that lost the primary? And disenfranchise millions? bravenak Dec 2016 #2
Exactly! BainsBane Dec 2016 #6
I looked at her history BainsBane Dec 2016 #3
Well I care what happens to America - thats why I supported another candidate in the primary el_bryanto Dec 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author CountAllVotes Dec 2016 #29
I don't care who you voted for in the primary BainsBane Dec 2016 #34
This!!! DemonGoddess Dec 2016 #39
the pres-elect CountAllVotes Dec 2016 #4
I voted for Hillary in the general election. So who exactly are you calling an idiot? nt el_bryanto Dec 2016 #13
Calling tRump supporters idiots CountAllVotes Dec 2016 #30
For most of his hayseed followers jambo101 Dec 2016 #21
Exactly! CountAllVotes Dec 2016 #28
Right, her voting record. The one that puts here squarely on the liberal side of Congress. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #7
Yep that's the one - She is a liberal; just not as liberal I would prefer, on a number of issues. el_bryanto Dec 2016 #14
That you even think that relevant now BainsBane Dec 2016 #35
well you cared enough to reply. el_bryanto Dec 2016 #36
if only we had believed Clint Eastwood and Empty Chair strawman Obama emulatorloo Dec 2016 #9
Well it seemed that people weren't interested in Russ Feingold's record or Cypher, Teachout, or still_one Dec 2016 #26
Trump is the *ultimate* elitist and the *ultimate* corporatist. He's a fricking BRAND, for heaven's TwilightZone Dec 2016 #5
But those Goldman Execs are being appointed BainsBane Dec 2016 #8
I think some of them just bought their own BS TwilightZone Dec 2016 #16
weapon-grade stupidity is right BainsBane Dec 2016 #20
You got played too if you think Hillary did everything she needed to do to win BeyondGeography Dec 2016 #11
I read that article BainsBane Dec 2016 #19
Sam Stein wrote a pretty definitive autopsy, if that one doesn't work for you BeyondGeography Dec 2016 #23
You might not have called her a corporatist. But a whole lot of people did. Constantly. kcr Dec 2016 #33
It was a silent coup, right before our eyes, with Russian help and assists from the FBI and Assange brush Dec 2016 #12
Yes it was nt Tumbulu Dec 2016 #25
This world wide wally Dec 2016 #27
It was a con by someone screaming from the rooftops with a megaphone Lucky Luciano Dec 2016 #15
Some people have to be in pain in order to learn. Yavin4 Dec 2016 #17
Sorry, think MUCH LONGER because the billionaires will never let us have flamingdem Dec 2016 #18
they are drunk on hate KT2000 Dec 2016 #22
addicted jambo101 Dec 2016 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #24
Yeah, it's a billionaire lollapalooza now. A veritable billionaire shindig. R B Garr Dec 2016 #32
Most of people... JSup Dec 2016 #37
Many Will Soon Enough colsohlibgal Dec 2016 #38
+1000000 triron Dec 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's clear people have no...»Reply #23