Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)The more rantings I hear from the right against the recount [View all]
The more I think there is a need for one.
Especially when those rantings are coherently written, with good English grammar. Trump supporters tend to write in Republicanese, which at best bears only superficial similarity to written English. Well-phrased, properly spelled rantings against a recount imply that people sophisticated enough to have had a hand in Trump-favoring fraud are uncomfortable with this. Wisconsin "discovering" 5000 fictitious votes for Trump the minute the recount was announced there only reinforces the necessity of one, in my opinion.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Greig Palist who is in contact with Jill's lawyers thinks it could turn Wisconsin
womanofthehills
Nov 2016
#23
"the country is perfectly fine with having him as POTUS"---Your statement is still incorrect.
anamandujano
Nov 2016
#43
Your statement that I called incorrect is that everyone is fine with him as POTUS and it is still
anamandujano
Nov 2016
#45
The shitty English could also be an indication of foreign state actors posting comments.
TheBlackAdder
Nov 2016
#17
In Russian, this would come out as "Girl left basket full fruit in house. She now home getting it."
anamandujano
Nov 2016
#36
"Their being worried says, to me That they know for a fact that the results are bogus." Agree.
anamandujano
Nov 2016
#37