Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buddhism

In reply to the discussion: So, is there a primer? [View all]

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
6. Well, this is not a primer ...
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 01:57 PM
Jan 2012

Yet, understanding of the critical mind and wise discrimination can be a potential illumination.

One can start with a comparison between direct experience and abstractions related to doctrine and scholarly approaches. My understanding of Buddhism is that it is not a religion, despite how some insist on making it so or framing the teachings in ways that bring in terms like "theological" where they don't seem to apply. In a teaching where the founder claims no godhood, nor does he expect you to simply believe what is taught without careful examination and testing for proof, how can Buddhism be, at its core and intent, be religious as we understand the term in the West?

My understanding is that the philosophical relationships and arguments between the various schools are the smoke from the fire of the central tenets. Those tenets are centered on the practice of nothing more or less than direct realization without mediator and the rest is merely either a by-product of ignorance or wisdom in relationship as abstractions "about". Anything about what is can be satisfied by direct awareness of the Moon that the fingers are pointing to. Some fingers might point to abstractions and more illusions, yet, that can be useful.

It is rather easy to conceptualize from afar about what the various schools are and how they interact, yet one would find more insight by actually living in the context of those who live a life as nuns, monks and teachers in community. We may all realize that the dynamics of human interaction can be a challenge where living what we believe, even know, is put to the test.

From our vantage point, what might have significance is not just the show going on between various flowers and weeds in the field, but the essence of the beauty, the nectar, the color and the realization, the vibrancy and clarity of the life that may be understood uniquely by each one of us. It is a path, no matter. Then, it is also a pathless path. Then it is neither. Ahh!

To consider the various schools of thought as aspects of one mandala allows us to apply insight and wisdom to those relationships, just as we do in our daily life of practice, living and experiencing. If every part of a mandala was the same, it would simply be a bland circle; a disk with simply an inner aspect and an outer. The mandala is a fitting metaphor with which we can expand our perspective with acceptance and gather the delicious fruits of Awakening to what he are all along.

Best wishes for well-being on your journey.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, is there a primer? [View all] Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 OP
I can't imagine using Buddhist and War in the same sentence. oxymoron Jan 2012 #1
Thanks! Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #2
"at the end of the day, we are all on the same side" ellisonz Jan 2012 #3
I would start with wikipedia MH1 Jan 2012 #4
Thank you! Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #5
Well, this is not a primer ... Newest Reality Jan 2012 #6
lol in the future I intend to start a thread on Theravada Bhuddism so that people can talk grantcart Jan 2012 #7
Useful and instructive Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #8
Not an expert by any means lindysalsagal Jan 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #10
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Buddhism»So, is there a primer?»Reply #6