Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

PoindexterOglethorpe

(28,003 posts)

3. Oh, for Christ's sake. I know only a tiny bit about such things,

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Fri Sep 2, 2016, 02:30 AM

Sep 2016

and I know that to explain the collapse of WTC buildings by controlled explosives if total nonsense. For one thing, what it would have taken to install such explosives would NOT have gone unnoticed by people in those buildings. The other explanation, that they wer put in place at the time the buildings were constructed, overlooks the very clear time frames connected to such explosives.

In short, those who propose this nonsense are idiots.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How credible is this European group? [View all] Archae Sep 2016 OP

They obviously have no idea how much prep work is involved Warpy Sep 2016 #1

It's not a European group William Seger Sep 2016 #2

Oh, for Christ's sake. I know only a tiny bit about such things, PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2016 #3

I figured this, somewhat. Archae Sep 2016 #4

Editor apparently hoodwinked by pseudosciencey bullshit William Seger Sep 2016 #5

I think so too, just like Andrew Wakefield and his "research." Archae Sep 2016 #6