Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

siligut

(12,272 posts)
14. Strict guidelines have to be followed in order for food to be labeled "Organic"
Sun May 19, 2013, 11:53 AM
May 2013

This is not true with the term "Natural", so here is where caveat emptor takes precedence, as the term may or may not indicate what matters to the consumer. Until the FDA devotes time, money and attention to combat corporate greed your annoyance will continue unless you take matters into your own hands and read the ingredient labels.

http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Transparency/Basics/ucm214868.htm
From a food science perspective, it is difficult to define a food product that is 'natural' because the food has probably been processed and is no longer the product of the earth. That said, FDA has not developed a definition for use of the term natural or its derivatives. However, the agency has not objected to the use of the term if the food does not contain added color, artificial flavors, or synthetic substances.


Technology speeding pass laws has been a concern for as long as I can remember. This is probably a philosophy discussion that Robert Oppenheimer might have been able to offer a few words of wisdom to.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Anybody else get fucking ...»Reply #14