Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,650 posts)
3. Granted, correlation does not prove causation, but it is highly suggestive
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 11:12 PM
Aug 3

A total lack of correlation pretty much proves a lack of causation. A strong correlation is evidence (but not proof) of causation.

That being said, the magnitude 8.8 quake a few days ago in the same region seems like a good suspect for a proximate cause with or without the solar maximum (i.e. this is likely an “aftershock.” )

BTW: What are the tides doing? There is growing appreciation of the relationship between tides and seismic activity. Essentially, there is a tidal bulge on land, just as there is on sea, even though it is smaller. It is believed this flexing of the crust (the traveling bulge) can lead to fault “slippage.” The highest tides (“king tides”) occur when the Moon is at its closest & the Sun, Moon and Earth are aligned, combining the Moon’s more obvious tides with the Sun’s less obvious tides.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»A volcano in Russia's Far...»Reply #3