Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,183 posts)
3. I can't say I have any use for the guy, but that's just me. His whining about the Cassini mission removed all...
Fri May 16, 2025, 04:40 PM
May 16

...credibility in my mind. He was being stupid about plutonium, and is still, from what I understand, stupid about nuclear technology in general. Kaku does have a cool haircut though.

A flaw in the film by the way is that it depicts Margarethe Bohr using the word plutonium in 1941 which is impossible, since the existence of plutonium was not known in 1941 in Denmark - it had only been identified on an atomic scale in early 1942 from experiments conducting in 1941 - and had definitely not been formally named by Seaborg. The code word for its existence was "49" a rather uninspiring and easily decipherable choice for element 94.

She certainly would not have known it was fissionable, nor would she understand that a reactor was required to make it, nor that it was a key to making a certain type of nuclear weapon.

Years ago, when I was at the Smithsonian, the original sample of plutonium (a few atoms on a metal target) was on display in the Museum of Science. I have no idea if it's still there.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The film version of Micha...»Reply #3